this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
110 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1645 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump’s re-election has sparked fears of an “imperial presidency” as he plans to expand presidential power, backed by a compliant Republican Congress and Supreme Court.

Trump’s agenda includes dismantling federal agencies, mass deportations, cutting education funding, restricting transgender rights, and a renewed “America First” foreign policy, potentially isolating the U.S. and straining alliances like NATO.

Critics warn of authoritarian tendencies, with plans to target political enemies and loosen rule of law constraints.

Civil society groups anticipate resistance, but experts fear Trump could invoke extreme measures like the Insurrection Act to quell opposition.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do you think we ought to relieve posts like this?

Like, we all know what he's going to do, we've had months and months of many outlets telling us what he'll do. We don't need the reminder.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I kind of agree. I don't see how it's helpful to speculate all of the insane things he can do. At best your just making people complacent, at worst your giving them ideas.

This is not to say that we shouldn't post every thing he actually does... I just don't see how these speculative articles are helpful to anyone other than people trying to make money off doom scrolling.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Fear and anger drive engagement and people love those sweet updoots.

The medium is the message, etc.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

To be very fair there is value to experts confirming something that is already widely speculated, and there are organizations and groups who need to prepare for likely Trump actions. It's just that in this case what they're confirming is obvious and therefore not very useful.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago

The word for a dictator that overthrows a republic and converts it to an empire is just, you know, Emperor.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Are there any historical examples of fascist regimes losing power without a violent takedown?

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

A gold-plated shitter age.