this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
432 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4255 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Project 2025, a manifesto supported by the conservative Heritage Foundation, calls for a ban on pornography, labeling its purveyors as criminals and advocating for strict penalties, including jail time for producers and registered sex offender status for educators distributing it.

The manifesto argues that porn lacks First Amendment protection, framing it as harmful and exploitative.

With a right-leaning Supreme Court, proponents aim to overturn existing protections established in Miller v. California, potentially impacting mainstream media.

Donald Trump has pledged to bring Project 2025 contributors onto his team.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 147 points 1 day ago (3 children)

registered sex offender status for educators distributing it

If a book in your classroom or school library has anything beyond a heterosexual peck on the cheek, congratulations, you're now a sex offender. Not a joke.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh boy, I can't wait for abstinance to be taught as the only form of sexual education in America.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

That was mine... In the early 00s. And again with a guest speaker... In my advanced marketing class... In the late 00s. I will never forget how that lady sat on a desk, explaining with vivid, passionate excitement and lust, how waiting for your life partner to be your first time is, moans and quivers, so good~

The fuck, Smith, I thought we were going to fuck around and watch movies while you go "make some copies" only to never return, like every other day. The fuck is this shit. Even your own kid in this class is visibly distraught and confused. Poor guy is fucking scarred for life.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm expecting them to go even further, and just stop doing sex education period.

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

When the schools close, I guess everybody has to go to Christian school now! No sex education at all, please!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

In my school in the Bible belt that was primarily what they focused on. I don't remember much time being given to condoms. I certainly don't remember ever being given one or shown how to use it (not that it's that difficult or anything, but still).

But what I do remember is a speaker coming to our school to talk to us about how he had sex outside of marriage and got a girl pregnant, but he did the right thing and got married. Also, and I cannot stress this enough, he described this as abstaining because he married the person he had sex with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 14 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

Download all the porn right now before it gets banned

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I have been downloading porn since 2001. Fear not!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 85 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Historically speaking people have two things they riot for, safety and comfort. How that comfort manifest varies but pornography is definitely on the same level as whiskey, and the United states has had a rebellion on that.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

THE GOONER REBELLION, WOOOOO!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

YOU CAN HAVE MY PORNHUB ACCOUNT WHEN YOU PRY IT FROM MY COLD, DEAD PENIS!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And somehow we just elected a guy who has no qualms with turning the military and the police on its own citizens despite legal doctrine.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well luckily the military has a good chance of not listening to him, atleast in my opinion. The police on the other hand are more of a threat, though not an insurmountable one.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

The liberal officers are going to resign in protest then pat themselves on the back and call it integrity.

Then the fascists are going to follow orders.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Good thing we spent the last 25 years giving the police surplus military equipment.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (14 children)

I mean invest in VPN stocks then?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 9 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Good luck! Literally all his fan base are probably rabid porn junkies.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago

I'm sure they'll get a secret pass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

I guess I gotta do my part and jack off twice a day or more to get the best of the porn we still have.

[–] Steak@lemmy.ca 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Do you want angry fat basement dwellers to rise up? Take away their porn. Let's see how this plays out.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Half of them have heart attacks walking up the stairs and the other half turn to ash when touched by sunlight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're back to 1920s. Mafia will bootleg porn from Mexico and Canada.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And of course they will use it as an excuse to implement complete surveillance on all your devices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Least important effect of a Trump presidency - but I'm sure if he did this it'd be the straw that broke the camel's back for Gen Z Trumpers.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The one thing this election has all but confirmed for me is that over half of the country supports these things unabashedly, and I highly doubt porn will be the hero that magically changes these people. It's already banned in multiple conservative states, and all of them just voted red again.

Honestly, I believe that if the Trump admin brought back prohibition, his bootlickers would be the first in line telling us how it's the best idea ever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then maybe they should have known that Project 2025 called for that before they decided to vote for Trump.

Violence against women is about to skyrocket when the incels can't get a date because they're too repulsive and can't watch porn to take out their sexual frustrations because of what they voted for.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 22 points 1 day ago

Then maybe they should have known that Project 2025 called for that before they decided to vote for Trump.

Those kids would be very angry if they could read

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Hilarious. As if this could ever actually be instituted nationwide. Regulations on sale and access maybe, but moral crusades like this are perpetually doomed to failure, much like the War on Drugs.

Doesn't mean they won't try, won't posture, won't grandstand about it, but to actually succeed in this goal when over 50% of the populace isn't going to be behind it? I guess we'll just have to watch them try.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 22 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The war on drugs only failed if you truly believe its goal was getting rid of drugs.

To quote John Erlichman, one of its architects:

“The Nixon Campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar Left, and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black. But by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

By the strandards of what it was created to do, the war on drugs was fantastically successful.

The war on porn will be successful in exactly the same way, because Republicans have already spent decades redefining all LGBTQ content as "pornographic". This is will be a tool for disrupting queer and trans communities, for erasing queer and trans resources and tearing down queer and trans rights activists. Stopping porn isn't the point, and it never was.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's not to try and ban porn

It's a way to snoop on all Internet traffic.

Like cops "smelling weed" anytime they want to hassle someone. If they don't like a person, they'll spy on their Internet usage, obviously find some kind of porn, and then make a public spectacle out of to distract from what they're mad at that person for.

They don't care about the crime, they want an excuse to investigate people they don't like.

Say something mean on twitter, and they'll search your IP till they find something they can call porn.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

They'll say they're gonna ban it and when there's uproar they'll say to "protect the kids" you need a digital ID to access porn. Then they'll expand it to everything, ban VPN's, encryption and there will be no more privacy. Big brother is watching, and if he deems you too woke, for whatever arbitrary reason, you're off to the gulag.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

No, but they can go after the owners and operators of major porn sites and have them shut down (and possibly executing them). Then the subsequent chilling effect that will occur, making sure nobody dares try to take their place.

You could probably use a VPN and find stuff, but say goodbye to pornhub, youporn, xvideos, etc. And in certain states they will probably make accessing it illegal (or simply using a VPN at all. And no, it will not matter that they're legitimately needed for all sorts of legal shit, it'll be used at the government's discretion (which means singling out people who are using it to access porn. Until it isn't, and they use it for whatever they want because they are the law).

This is what fascism is. People really don't seem to grasp this. We need to stop viewing he world from this current paradigm, because come January 20, this nation will become unrecognizable.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›