this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
202 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3906 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senator Lindsey Graham urged special counsel Jack Smith to end his legal cases against Donald Trump after Trump’s projected 2024 presidential victory.

Graham criticized the charges as “politically motivated” and claimed the American public was tired of “lawfare.”

Smith, appointed in 2022, had charged Trump over classified documents and his role in the January 6 Capitol attack. The Supreme Court’s recent decision limiting prosecution scope bolstered Trump’s legal position.

Trump, convicted in a separate case involving business record falsification, has indicated plans to dismiss Smith upon taking office in January.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 174 points 6 days ago (4 children)

It's time I stop reading the news for the next 4 years. It's going to be nothing but absolutely infuriating.

Trump gets away with everything and the people trying to uphold some sense of justice immediately get the hammer.

I hate people so much.

[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 34 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Not reading the news isn't going to make the situation better or worse. I understand the sentiment, but don't understand why saying it is useful. Hiding your head in the sand doesn't mean your body won't be harmed.

There are better ways to cope with the emotional onslaught of this change. Focusing on your community, finding new digital communities, learning to cope in general, finding validating ways to feel liberated... In other words actions. Small perhaps, but beyond this notion of burying our heads in the sand.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

I think that's their point. Reading it doesn't help, it'll just stress you out and cause worry. For most people there's nothing we can do, so ignoring it might be the healthiest option.

[–] Lennny@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)

If I keep reading it I'm eventually going to go buy a 9mm and eat some lead . Sometimes not participating IS the best option.

[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Look, yes avoidance is a valid behavior. We have it, we need it, and it's useful at times, but like any behavior it can become a dependence. Wholly depending on an attitude of avoidance to deal with the outside world doesn't build resilience. Desensitizing to the trauma and being able to face it, and act in spite of seems like a better goal.

It's a screwed up depressing world and I empathize with the horror, disgust, disillusionment, disenfranchised nature of the world.

I struggle with it constantly, and maybe we should create a support group or a sub for this alone, as we need to find ways to cope with this, as it's not going to get fixed in a vacuum. Yet we can't fix it if we are overwhelmed and emotionally shutdown...

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

I'm not sure becoming desensitised to trauma is an effective strategy either. That suggests that we stop caring about what's going on.
I'm in the same situation, 2016-2020 was a stressful time. Constantly trying to keep up with each horrible new development, about which I could do nothing but despair, became an unhealthy obsession. I don't want to do that again. I'm not a political scientist, and I neglected my own personal growth and development becoming an armchair expert in politics because I could see what was happening. This time I'm going to focus on myself and the people around me because that's all I can do. The world will keep turning. If I have the opportunity to do something positive, I'll take it.

I'm with you on that brother

[–] kwomp2@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Dude, get organized

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is the worst part of it all. Trump will serve 4 more years (and hopefully not a day longer) and retire blissfully. He's getting away with everything scot-free.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

With his health I doubt he will live that long.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Oh, perfect, President Vance.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Mostly nazis.

Yes the response to stopping them was shit on several fronts. But all of that added together multiplied by three is less than nazi republican badness.

[–] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 82 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] ticho@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago (3 children)

They don't seem to be getting destroyed, though...

[–] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 44 points 6 days ago

All republicans who refused to fall in line with MAGAtism at pretty much all levels of public representation have been beyond destroyed politically.

Look at all of trumps "enemies" and those he calls "traitors" to see the ones eliminated based on his word.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

The "we" turned into "everybody"

[–] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

"yet" is one of the few things keeping me going.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

he sold his soul long before that. Several times.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

For a little while at least.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 35 points 6 days ago

Fight on, Jack!
But it's understandable if you choose not to.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Sheesh, I wish Biden would take a cue from the Supreme Court and just have a few of these people arrested, including Graham and call it a Presidential action.

Then let the lower courts decide.

Show them what "lawfare" really is, LOL. Lawfare, FFS, these assholes don't have an original bone in their bodies. They get one of their thought leaders braying out something like "lawfare" and they just endlessly parrot it for EVERYTHING.