My guess is that somebody has already forked it if it's a dependency and so somebody else will just republish it.
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
72 points (96.2% liked)
Technology
59415 readers
3175 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yep, a few forks were identified within a few hours. I think the maintainers had forks too.
Honestly, 800 stars isn't a huge impact anymore on its own. I think the age of the repo and frequency of updates matters more. If there is a fork that is more active, people will switch to it.
some forks have outdated commits, the latest one recorded by wayback machine last month is e935959d2f9cc642bcbb5e7759b2b1e7196b0947, which can still be found in a few repos:
https://github.com/search?q=e935959d2f9cc642bcbb5e7759b2b1e7196b0947&type=commits
btw, the mirror linked in the github conversation is also out of date in relation to the original repo.