this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
145 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3191 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Polls show Donald Trump is already facing a significant deficit with female voters in his race against Vice President Kamala Harris.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago

It's not even taken out of context. He literally said, “I said, well, I’m going to do it whether the women like it or not. I am going to protect them.”

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Conservatives have huge issues with consent. Remember this Rush Limbaugh quote?

You can do anything, the left will promote and understand and tolerate anything, as long as there is one element. Do you know what it is? Consent. If there is consent on both or all three or all four, however many are involved in the sex act, it’s perfectly fine, whatever it is. But if the left ever senses and smells that there’s no consent in part of the equation then here come the rape police. But consent is the magic key to the left.

They understand the concept of consent, but it offends their patriarchal values so they loathe that it is seen as a virtue (and indeed, a moral necessity for sexual acts) by people who aren't tuned-up right-wing freaks.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 weeks ago

I can't believe someone uttered that monologue with the expectation that it's a winning argument. Like, yes? Perform sex acts without consent and the police should be, in fact, after you.

"You sick bastards will permit anything as long as it's between consenting adults!"

Ummm, yeah? Glad you finally grasp what we've been saying.

[–] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Because of his billionaire background, he already knows where he can grab them to keep them close at hand. He's been practising for this policy with several reluctant women over the years.

[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would ANY woman vote for this creep....

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

Stockholm syndrome?

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The fox calls themself the shepherd.

[–] korny@communick.news 4 points 2 weeks ago

I have woman skills, what the hell is wrong with you women!

https://youtu.be/fcIMIyQnOso