this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
541 points (99.1% liked)

News

23276 readers
4166 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LunarVoyager@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago
[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It's sad how much this will hurt good people who work for the Washington Post and how little this will affect Bezos.

[–] actual_pillow@programming.dev 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If you still work at the Post after all this time it's kind of on you. They've had years to find employment at outlets that aren't a direct mouthpiece for Bezos.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The can cancel as well and work somewhere else.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Can’t imagine many news publications are offering competitive job offers.

Job hunting isn’t that great at the moment

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago

Well, it's the price of not being dependent on billionaires.

On the other hand, if the hundreds of thousands of subscribers go to a some publication (I've seen propublica recommended earlier in the comments, for instance) they will be able to pay a decent salary to a bunch of those journalists.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 36 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

On the one hand, I know that the newspaper had done this for decades and stopped now...

On the other hand: If a big German newspaper recommended voting a specific person, this would be a huge scandal...

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 54 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We have only 2 major parties and one has been a criminal enterprise for 56 years

  • Nixon Watergate
  • Reagan: sold drugs to buy guns for guys Congress said not to buy guns for because they were mass murderers
  • Bush Sr US: helped with above
  • Bush Jr faked evidence for a war which killed half a million people and cost 6 trillion dollars also illegally tortured
  • Trump do I even need to do this one?

At this point Trump wants to form militias to round up 25M people and drag them to concentration camps and turn the military loose on anyone who disagrees.

This includes 11M undocumented workers who almost all live law abiding lives and Americans who were born here from above who are by our constitution citizens regardless of the status of their parents.

He has publically called for violence, and end to our constitution, a new era where the dictator tells the government what the law is.

It is strange for any responsible party not to oppose essentially Hitler.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Opposing soneone is not unusual in Germany. Supporting one person or party is what does not happen here.

I'm not a fan of the orange one... Just telling about the German view on this..

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

With 2 parties supporting the other is the only way that you oppose the one.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

The only way that you effectively oppose the other

You can always vote third party if you want to pay lip service while helping the candidate you dislike

[–] eunieisthebus@feddit.org 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The comparison doesn't work. In the US it is common practice that a newspaper gives a recommendation.

Also the US has a two party system. Compare this to Germany's multi party system. If you are undecided between to options a recommendation might help. If you are undecided whether you should vote the Greens or SPD a newspaper recommending CDU doesn't help you at all.

While it is not illegal for a newspaper to give a recommendation in Germany, it would be a scandal indeed. But the only reason for this would be that they didn't do it before. People are just complaining about changes like in this case as well

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago

Which drives the partisanisation of the media. Bozo is right about one thing: the trust in media is at an all time low in the US and trust is build through accurate and unbiased reporting. Endorsing politicians is biased as hell.

The newspapers repudiation of a fascist in dangerous times would hit that much harder had they not endorsed other politicians in less dangerous times.

So now it's damned if they do, damned if they don't... swallow that pill they must at some point. But it would have been an easier pill to swallow after the rule of fascism in the US had been averted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 142 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The numbers are based on the number of cancellation emails that have been sent out, according to a source at the paper, though the subscriber dashboard is no longer viewable to employees.

Bozos doesn't like you looking at how badly he fucked up.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Do Amazon next. I plan to let mine expire. Amazon video is trash.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't think I've ever watched anything from Amazon directly.

Seen lots of their content though :) 🏴‍☠️

[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I always get excited when I see the files labelled with AMZN, the quality is consistent

Even when I was a subscriber, I would just grab the torrent, much more enjoyable to watch with VLC than a browser

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 21 hours ago

Seen lots of their content though :) 🏴‍☠️

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 45 points 22 hours ago

Just canceled prime too

[–] JaymesRS 57 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Their subscriber numbers have been absolutely decimated by Bezos’ decision.

[–] DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca 84 points 23 hours ago (8 children)

It’s down 10% which is the literal definition of decimated!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

CNN talks about WaPo getting a backlash for not endorsing, but says nothing about Bezos intervention, lol.

https://lite.cnn.com/2024/10/29/media/usa-today-gannett-newspapers-endorsement-president/index.html

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

That's weird. I know CNN is quite familiar with dipshits intervening in coverage, so they should be able to spot it. They had one fuckface bend over backwards to give Donald an hour in front of a friendly live audience with a milquetoast moderator who was able to do fuckall against the lies.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

picture of Kelly self-insert

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Chump change for Bozos. Hardly a scratch

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 26 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I daresay this is the outcome he hoped for. Suddenly there are a bunch of open editorial author seats to fill. Taking bets on those seats being filled by people who don't lean quite so far to the left.

And a significant loss in subscribers? That's just the principled people fleeing who weren't gonna buy his nonsense either way. The people who stick around are the ones who are okay with billionaire interference in their news source, and those are the people Bezos wants as subscribers.

[–] FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

😔

Damn, that's quite plausible.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

And he doesn't give a shit. Subscribers don't matter, control of a well known paper that will push his interests does.

load more comments
view more: next ›