this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1348 points (97.5% liked)

memes

10101 readers
2410 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If you don't have this kit you will be bombarded to Temu's ads

Better version: https://lemmy.world/post/21245770

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 194 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I'd actually recommend consent-o-matic instead of IDCAC. It actually selects the minimum concent for you instead of just hiding it.

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

EDIT: Ignore my blind confidence. CAD is (mostly) broken in recent FF versions. (See ivn's reply to this post).

Consent-o-Matic with Cookie Auto Delete and Firefox's Multi-Account Container tabs covers it all nicely for me.

Cookie banners get handled, cookies I don't explicitly want to keep automatically disappear when I leave the site/close the tab, and those I do want to keep can be given their own containers to keep them separated.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 33 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Cookie autodelete doesn't work with strict mode and you should use strict mode. Just drop it.

You don't need an extension to auto remove cookies with Firefox.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ivn@jlai.lu 127 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (19 children)

Drop IDCAC and Privacy Badger, add consent-o-matic, sponsorblock and bypass paywall clean.

Check Arkenfox for Firefox config and extension recommendations.

https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions

Only use temp mails for unimportant, one-shot account, otherwise use an email relay.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 57 points 1 week ago

It's insane how big a fight we have to put to JUST surf the damn Internet.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why drop privacy badger? It's been working well for me.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Because it doesn't bring anything more than Firefox in strict mode and uBlock Origin.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 122 points 1 week ago (9 children)

DONT use the "I Don't Care About Cookies" plugin. It was sold to Avast. The same company that stole users information and sold it ON A PRIVACY PRODUCT illegally for years causing them to get sued for 16 million. (slap on the wrist tbh)

https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/whats-new/acquisition/

https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/22/24080135/avast-security-privacy-software-ftc-fine-data-harvesting

[–] Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why would someone use that instead of uBlock origin cookie filter?

Its really best to keep browser extensions as few as possible for fingerprinting resistance

To OP/readers you're OK with extensions this would be a better pick imo (read installation instructions)

https://github.com/bpc-clone?tab=repositories

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 94 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Privacy badger is not longer needed IIRC, its role is taken care by uBlock.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IDCAC should not be on this list since it was compromised, ABP-style. consent-o-matic is probably better but the most direct replacement is "I Still Don't Care About Cookies".

[–] sp6@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't the "EasyList/uBO – Cookie Notices" filter in uBlock's settings do the same thing as IDCAC / consent-o-matic?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SouravSatvaya@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

UBO can block YT ads, no need to use a seperate ad blocker for YT

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Sponsorblock to auto skip sponsor segments, or even non music parts of music on YouTube. Or interaction reminders, or end credits, etc can make it a little bit how you want it

[–] lime_red@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (7 children)
[–] jastyty@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Download jerboa

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why don't you download something like Voyager or Thunder from f-droid?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Phone settings > Private DNS > set DNS provider host name to dns.adguard-dns.com.

Problem solved.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

ublock origin has a cookie notice and nag filter that removes those.

go into the settings and turn on the annoyance filters, they are awesome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UmeU@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vendul@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Ublock origin already has privacy badger and no cookies functionality. Worst case nothing gets blocked. Also slower internet for you.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What’s the upside down Z-Library icon in the lower left for YT?

[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 23 points 1 week ago

Currently, it is recovering from attacks from Google. Only self-hosting works reliably at the moment..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 25 points 1 week ago

Go into uBO settings and then filters and enable all the non-language filters. You won't need privacy badger or that cookie addon anymore.

[–] AllToRuleThemOne@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Another recommendation for YT:

SponsorBlock

It is Community-Based. Ppl (like you) mark timecodes from sponsor ads and if toggled on those will be skipped. You can whitelist channels as well if you want to.

150% better YT-experience!

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

If I'm going to see an ad, I do prefer sponsor ads over the injected YT ads. At least I can hope the content creators are getting paid directly for the ad.

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

I’m not saying my setup is any better, but it currently looks like this:

  • Firefox
  • UBO
  • SponsorBlock
  • Return YouTube Dislikes
  • DeArrow
  • Archive.ph

I’m open to suggestions if anybody knows any better alternatives. I’ve had mixed luck with services that filter out YouTube’s crap.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 20 points 1 week ago

Be careful with using Privacy Badger and uBO together as it might get in each other's way. I had YouTube detect me having ad block until I paused Privacy Badger for YT.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 1 week ago (24 children)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

NewPipe and FreeTube if you want YT subscriptions without ads

Addy.io or simplelogin for email account signups

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Install the LibRedirect extension and fiddle a bit with the settings to automatically redirect to privacy respecting alternatives away from ad heavy sites.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If I can’t recover an account because I used temp mail

I just make another

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Shift + RClick to force the browser's native context menu instead of triggering a JavaScript event.

Ctrl + Shift + E (and then perhaps Ctrl + F5) to see URLs of resources.

load more comments
view more: next ›