this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
131 points (97.1% liked)

Games

16751 readers
628 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 54 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Honestly, Im really suprised official support lasted this long. Microsoft largely gave up on VR years ago.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 75 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

that hype train was fun though. The standard microsoft loop.

  • They build a crappy version
  • Put no actual investment in it
  • Drop the idea
  • Someone else comes along, makes a version that's great, and microsoft gets jealous
  • Microsoft throws 1000% of their resources behind the technology which they are now behind in
  • They cram the product down everyone's throats, not realizing how much they're annoying their base
  • Realizing defeat, they quietly kill off the product and act like it never happened.

Windows Tiles, Windows Phone, Zune, Tablets, AI, take your pick

[–] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

NGL x86-64 tablets are legitimately much more useful than their competition.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Surface tablets are niche but SO much more useful than the app-restricted alternatives from samsung or apple. Nuke windows and stick your fav distro with a tablet frontend on there and it becomes an incredibly versatile little machine.

[–] axby@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I’ve never been into tablets, are Surfaces as easy to install Linux on as a PC? Is there any bootloader unlocking or anything like on a phone, or is it more like secure boot on a PC?

I had installed Linux on an old Chromebook and it would always offer to wipe the hard drive on every boot, so now I’ve assumed that some hardware isn’t as Linux friendly as others. I think a lot has changed since I got my desktop and the last laptop that I installed Linux on.

And are the Linux touch screen interfaces any good? I tried a Fairphone that was running something Linux and the touch interface was lacking. (It was a great tiny laptop for using a terminal though).

And last random thought… I loved the 10” netbook form factor back in 2009 or so. I think tablets are a similar size, but the weight is in the “monitor” part, I preferred the bottom heavy laptop form factor. Are the Surfaces okay for that, or top heavy enough that they can fall over and can’t have the angle adjusted finely like a laptop?

[–] MrPozor@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago

I terms of installation they are actually a PC. Just load your favorite distro on a USB stick and install it as you would on a Desktop. For me Ubuntu is working great on an older Surface Go, including touch. The keyboard cover is highly recommended of course.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

Surface are basically a tablet (=all hardware and weight in the monitor). You can get them with a cover that contains a keyboard but it is still top heavy (think of a normal cover for a tablet, but slightly more sturdy because of the keyboard).

There's also a surface book that more or lees is like a laptop - from the looks of it. The bottom part with the keyboard is heavier, but only contains the keyboard, an USB hub and additional batteries. It's till top heavy with it, as you can "detach the screen" and still have a fully functional "PC tablet".

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

I got a second hand surface go 2 recently and it's the perfect companion device. I wish marvel unlimited and the like had apps on windows but that doesn't do me from using a different comic app and building up my own library anyway, probably for the better long term.

I just found out about mouse without borders yesterday and now my surface go 2 is like a portable monitor for my dev laptop when it's not docked in my study. But because it's still technically it's own thing and not just an extended desktop, I can have documentation on it and scroll with the touchscreen when needed without messing up the mouse on the laptop screen, but if i need to properly interact with the tablet I can just use the mouse and keyboard on my laptop too.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

I wish Windows Phone had stayed. More competition in the mobile space is good, and they had some functioning ideas. Eventually they gave up and turned into a pale Apple imitator before giving up.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Software "support" is such a fucked up thing these days.

Dropping support no longer means "You're on your own now, bye!"

Dropping support now means "Yoink! That's ours. Bye!"

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Honestly, the idiots running software that has been unsupported for years with gaping security holes that enabled botnets to attack everyone else are to blame for that one.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No, the issue isn't irresponsible devs.

The only issue here is companies who treat my device as theirs, and make decisions about what needs to be removed from my PC. And of course the voters (like your safety-OCD ass) that tolerate this bullshit being a legal option.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Didnt even know it has support. But I also dont have VR so I never bothered looking it up.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 48 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'd be sad if it wasn't for the fact that 3rd party methods of playing MC in VR are actually better than the official method. Though this does suck for those with PSVR and not PCVR (though, can't it do that now?)

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"drop" is an autoantonym.

Will VR be introduced as a new feature next year, or is it already a feature that will be abandoned next year?

[–] Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

there has been a vr version that is aparently no longer supported

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Would be fucked if they delete the working version to ensure "purity" and parity in the state of supported versions, and not just leave it be, not update it and let people keep their shit.

Edit: Aaaaaaaand it looks like that's the case. ~~Live and let live.~~ Cull the weak.

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

There's no real VR version of Minecraft for them to leave be or for people to lose access to. VR is just a feature built into the Bedrock Edition that's activated by launching the game through a headset.

Unless you count the Samsung Gear VR version. That one's been left alone ever since the Gear VR fell into obsolescence and can still be played in its unsupported state on an unsupported headset.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's no real VR version of Minecraft for them to leave be or for people to lose access to. VR is just a feature built into the Bedrock Edition that's activated by launching the game through a headset.

Since Better Together, that is the VR version, just like Bedrock on iOS is the iOS version.

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

No it's not like that. Unlike Minecraft Bedrock on PC, XBOX, PS, Switch, iOS, or Android, there's no VR specific Minecraft version that can be installed. If you have Minecraft on PS4 or PC, VR support is already built in.

For example, Skyrim and Skyrim VR are separate games, but Minecraft isn't. They can't just leave the VR version alone because there is no VR-only version and the only thing that determines whether you're playing in 2D or VR is a flag that's set on launch.

Edit: Again, discounting the Gear VR version here because they dropped support for it long before Better Together happened and it can only be played on the Gear VR which was basically Google Cardboard.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't see how that's a difference. They all use the same codebase, so either none of these platform editions exist or all of them exist.

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're the same codebase, but they all need to be bought separately from each other. Like, there will probably come a day when Minecraft Bedrock on Nintendo Switch stops receiving updates, but the PS5 version continues on.

For there to be a VR version for them to just stop updating like that, a VR-specific version would need to exist in the first place. They can't just abandon VR as-is but still have it available to be played like they did with Minecraft on the 3DS because there isn't a VR version they can abandon.

They abandoned the Gear VR verison, but that was a separate installation from regular Minecraft Bedrock and they could just stop updating that version of the app.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Abandoning maintenance of the feature is pretty much just dropping the version. This just feels like needlessly pedantic talk to me. What matters is that this medium of play is now unsupported.

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They can't really just leave a feature to start breaking as updates go on, especially not one that can cause as many problems as VR can.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, so they're dropping it.

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

Well that's a shame

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] NateSwift@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Vivecraft is on Modrinth as well

https://modrinth.com/mod/vivecraft

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 weeks ago

Never knew it did support it. I've always used mods like vivecraft to do it

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m in the middle of moving so all my VR stuff is packed in storage. Sadly, I may never get to try it.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty sure Java still has VR mods.

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That’s cool to know, but is there also a mod to use a controller? That’s what keeps me in bedrock (currently playing android bedrock version on Linux).

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/controllable

The answer to “is there a mod for adding X to Minecraft Java” is almost always “yes”

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Nice, thanks!

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, there are. I think one is called something like Controllable or Controllerable or something.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

That is either the bane or something really close. It's really damn good too.

[–] NateSwift@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Java VR is way nicer than what Microsoft had. Their MS implementation always left me nauseous and I’d never had a problem with that in VR before

[–] SuzyQ@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

I find this hilarious because you can currently buy a Minecraft themed charging brick and/or cord and get a code for a cosmetic VR headset for bedrock edition inside the packaging. 🙃

[–] shani66@ani.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

Good. If they are going to continue to develop the game they need to lose parity as an excuse to do the bare minimum.

[–] levzzz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Hope they won't drop support for RTX; it hasn't been updated since release...

load more comments
view more: next ›