this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
95 points (96.1% liked)

Ukraine

8216 readers
912 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 23 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

On Ukraines side, but those nail bombs violate the Geneva Convention

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I didn’t know that. What is the difference between this, and “built-in” shrapnel in explosives (from a legal perspective)? The end result is all the same after the explosion

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some of those nails are rusty. It's not hygienic.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago

TIL war is okay as long as you're hygienic.

[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Only think I know is that fragment size can't be too small, maybe you can argue that a nail is untested and thus can make micro fragments? Curious to know why this wouldn't be allowed

Edit: looks like there is a general ban on "unnecessary suffering or superfluous wounds", so if the nails are strong enough to injure but not kill, they are prohibited.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Increased lethality to the target is OK though

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, this topic is pretty crazy. I get banning nukes, and gassing, but shrapnal limitations?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago

Right so my understanding is something like fishhooks would be illegal because they’re shaped to maximize suffering, but these would be fine.

[–] Docus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Let’s do some thorough testing then. For uh.. science

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Geneva Convention guidelines

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] scemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Geneva spam pamphlets

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The poor invading forces have an easy way to avoid it.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's more like most states interpret it to allow reciprocity.

Can't handle the heat, don't start a fire, etc.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'd imagine a thin 3d printed jacket filled with ball bearings will exponentially increase the amount of shrapnell, it this ghetto variant looks nasty too.

[–] AceQuorthon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

Absolute redneck engineering

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago

mmm tetanus bomb

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Tape loses tackiness in moist or humid conditions so before summer the UA will want to switch to steel plumber's tape/pipe straps.