this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
497 points (92.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5587 readers
2614 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Calling Republicans government...smh

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

When did they protect us from TikTok? They didn't. Other than that it would be a great point

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

They're trying to get it shut down?

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Because its a threat to the military. Take all the time you need with this.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And I hope they succeed. But this has been talked about for 3-4 years now and hasn't happened

[–] flames5123@lemmy.world 4 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago)

It’s an actual case now though. They have until Jan 19 to sell US date to a US broker or else Apple and Google have 6 months from that date to remove it from the App Store.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 7 points 2 hours ago

*40 year inflation brought on because the government wanted 14 years of free money for Corporations.

Monetary policy and Corporate price gouging are the drivers for inflation. Everything else is noise.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (10 children)

Then you should have voted blue, idiot. This situation exists because of apathy and antigovernment sentiment.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Did Clinton ever undo all the load of crap Reagan and Bush gave us?

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Clinton was 30 fucking years ago and Republicans have been stonewalling ever since then on every since one of these issues.

What the fuck are you talking about about????

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

H. W. actually fought against the Reaganomics himself, so while the two didn't agree on foreign policy there wasn't much that had to be undone between Bush and Clinton.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 56 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

They aren't protecting you. They are protecting themselves from what you may give their enemies. Don't think just because the federal government is doing something "for the people" that nominally it's not about the government itself. National security is literally the government protecting itself by protecting its citizens.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Facebook sold personal data to a foreign organization called Cambridge Analytica who used it to influence our elections. If their motivations are to protect us via protecting themselves, why is Facebook not banned, and not even in the discussion of being banned?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

For one thing, today isn't 2015

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Did occurring in 2015 happen to make it less bad somehow? We sure as hell weren't passing laws to ban facebook back then either, so I'm not sure what point you think you've made.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Wrong. They let Cambridge collect it on their platform. Huge difference.

The rest of your post is irrelevant.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 hour ago

Their justification for banning Tiktok is that it allows the Chinese government to collect on their platform. It's the same fucking thing.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

And we should ban them too. I love this argument. We need better user data privacy laws, and this whataboutism does not change the fact that China is a hostile foreign nation.

I can appreciate that people view Google and Meta and so on as very similar in their transgressions. But as was pointed out in the original comment, this is a cost to benefit ratio type of analysis for the federal government and they gain more by keeping Meta and Google going and can enact other measures to prevent that from hurting them (usually reactionary), so to them this is fine. It is and always has been about what the US government can to do protect itself and enrich itself. Enrichment doesn't always come in the form of monetary value.

If you're upset at your own government (or government adjacent tech entities) gathering this type of data from users, you should be for banning them too, not keeping tik tok.

[–] Sakychu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Pretty much this! Also it is much easier and cheaper to tell Google to stop offering tiktok in their app store then it is to build affordable housing where it is needed..

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 28 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I’m on board with the sentiment but are we really defending TikTok? I haven’t kept up on the issue but personally I wouldn’t cry if TikTok went away.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 22 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Facefuck and Twitter are just as bad but they spy on Americans for America, so it is allowed

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Ding ding ding. Huge diff between China having that data and us companies, yes.

You're learning!

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Save your condescension for someone else

[–] variants@possumpat.io 17 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly get rid of all of them

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

They won't go away until people stop using them, and good luck with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We are not defending tiktok

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Didn't you know that if you criticize one thing it means the opposite is perfect and beyond reproach!

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Mostly agreed, but is anyone really getting minimum wage? Walmart pays double that to start in my little town.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If min was 15 wal mart would pay 30, son.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Idaho has federal minimum and iirc laws preventing county or city minimums to be higher than the state minimum. Lots of service and farmhand jobs there are at minimum wage. One of the places I used to work was saught after in the town because they pay higher than minimum. I made $7.50/hr

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Farm jobs will never be $15/hr in Your lifetime

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Go to places like KY, IN, TN, WV. Probably LA, and MS. They regularly start people @ minimum wage, and the rents are about 2/3 what I would pay in San Diego.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

How can Steve ban tiktok if Doug won't let him mitigate homelessness? Why is Bob talking about housing when Alex is gung-ho on genocide?

Sorry, I meant to ask: how can the government ban tiktok when the government won't do anything about homelessness? How can the government be proud of mitigating homelessness when the government supports genocide?

Citizens United must be a curse from a Greek god. A funny little jab to highlight our tendency to oversimplify.

load more comments
view more: next ›