this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
252 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58757 readers
3799 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Obligatory hint that SMR isn't suited for RAID systems.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

A better way to word it is: SMR is only suited for archival usage. Large writes, little-to-no random writes.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

I wonder how the read performance would be.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 7 hours ago

Think of the parity!

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

If you eyeballing these, please remind that these babies tend to be LOUD AS FUCK, so might not be suitable for home server use.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Just don't put it in your bedroom. All those dead skin cells wouldn't do good to it anyway.

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

I've found that the only thing you can hear through a closed basement door are noisy high speed fans, e.g. from used 19" servers, disks produce much less noise.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

Are they any louder than any HDD from the last 30 years?

If so, im actually curious why that is

Edit: fixed to say HDD not SSD

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Well I have no experience with these particular drives, but they do seem to have 11 platters. Which is beyond insane as far as I'm concerned. More platters means more moving parts, more friction more noise (all other things being equal).

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Oops, yes. I definitely would expect these to be much louder than your 6 GB 1998 model HDD wrangling under stress of copying files at 30 MB/s.

[–] Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Tell that to my IBM 10GB 10.000 RPM U2W SCSI from back then. To this day I have never witnessed a noisier harddrive... But that PC was pretty epic, including the biggest mf of a mainboard I ever had (the SCSI controller was onboard).

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Ah, the sound of turning on the SCSI storage tower.

KA-TSCHONK. WeeeeeeeeEEEEEIIIIIII... skrrrt, skrrrt, clack.

Either that or KA-TSCHONK, silence, if there were already too many boxes on that circuit at a lan party 😁

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Your everyday modern HDD does not much more than 60MB/s after the on-disk cache (a few GB) is full.

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My Jellyfin just quivered…

[–] PHLAK@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago
[–] addie@feddit.uk 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Assuming that these have fairly impressive 100 MB/s sustained write speed, then it's going to take about 93 hours to write the whole contents of the disk - basically four days. That's a long time to replace a failed drive in a RAID array; you'd need to consider multiple disks of redundancy just in case another one fails while you're resilvering the first.

[–] SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

Except these drives are SMR - not something you'd want in a RAID.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 9 points 23 hours ago

This is one of the reasons I use unRAID with two parity disks. If one fails, I'll still have access to my data while I rebuild the data on the replacement drive.

Although, parity checks with these would take forever, of course..

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 23 hours ago

That's a pretty common failure scenario in SANs. If you buy a bunch of drives, they're almost guaranteed to come from the same batch, meaning they're likely to fail around the same time. The extra load of a rebuild can kill drives that are already close to failure.

Which is why SANs have hot spares that can be allocated instantly on failure. And you should use a RAID level with enough redundancy to meet your reliability needs. And RAID is not backup, you should have backups too.

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

2 parity is standard and should still be adequate. Likelihood of two failures within four days on the same array is small.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve been looking to buy a couple 24TB drives. Hopefully, this pushes their price down.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Peertube instance owners rejoice!

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or just people who download porn.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who doesn't have multiple TB of videos just laying around?

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] swag_money@lemmy.world -1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

*pisses pants nervously before turning into a wolf

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wish there were TBs of porn of what I was into.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

If porn was just created on demand instead of filling millions of hdd's, would anyone notice or care? Finally a use for generative AI.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

I don't have porn just lying around, thank you very much

It's all seeding for the other degenerates, doing hard work

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I prefer 1980s porn jpgs around 90kB each thankyouverymuch.

It's crazy sizes though uf you think about it, I have like 2 or 4 TB drives and they are far from full.

[–] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When will it be commercially available though? Supposedly Seagate has had 30TB drives out for the better part of a year, but I can't find anything larger than 24TB actually available for purchase.

[–] Pyotr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I've been waiting for a 32TB to become available as well, Seagate announced that drive last year and it's still not available outside data centers. I suspect the WD one will be the same.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago