this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
335 points (98.6% liked)

News

23301 readers
4087 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 185 points 1 month ago (3 children)

When I read the headline I thought about the audacity Mississippi had to spend money training dogs to sniff out abortion pills. Then I read the article:

"An employee there had reported seeing someone in the lobby putting pills into hot pink envelopes."

....and....

"Steed, a K-9 handler, arrived with Rip, his narcotics sniffer dog. Rip strode around and, when he got to the pink envelope, sat down. According to records obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, Steed said this meant the dog had smelled narcotics. "

So no, the police dog can't sniff out abortion pills, instead a dirty cop either signaled his dog to the behavior, or the copy is straight lying about what the dog did.

If anything any defense attorneys must love this. If the police indicate a dog is signaling drugs where there weren't any, then any searches authorized by that dog's actions should be thrown out including any evidence found in a followup human search.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So no, the police dog can't sniff out abortion pills, instead a dirty cop either signaled his dog to the behavior, or the copy is straight lying about what the dog did.

You're not wrong, but that reality didn't stop a warrant from being issued or those envelopes from being opened

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And justice being served eventually also doesn't help the person get the care they need in a timely manner. Abortions are safer when done earlier in the pregnancy, and often there are more legal hoops that have to be jumped through later in the pregnancy if they're not barred altogether. A court case settled a year or more later doesn't do much to help a woman who needs care now whether it's for immediate physical safety or to prevent her body from being used for life support for another person without her consent.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I don't disagree with any of that.

My point of positivity was for any defendants that are currently serving time or holding a criminal record for any narcotics charges attached from that police dog's (and his handler) prior actions.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Something about "justice deferred"...

[–] lido@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

Because judges usually need the support of the prosecutor and police to get re-elected. So the warrant will be issued, otherwise the judge is "soft on crime". It's never "the judge is strong on Constitutional rights."

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

You’re not wrong, but that reality didn’t stop a warrant from being issued or those envelopes from being opened

Nothing stops police from intervening in any way shape or form. The only thing a warrant does is make the actions or evidence legal for future legal proceedings .

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those dogs all operate on signaling from the handling officer.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those dogs all operate on signaling from the handling officer.

If there is a long pattern of dogs are signaling "drugs" (irrespective of why they're signaling) when there are no drugs found, that sounds like a great angle defense attorneys can use to get any evidence found thrown out of court.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Drug dogs being unreliable in the real world use by police is not a new topic so don't get your hopes up.

https://www.livescience.com/9215-police-dogs-sniff-drugs.html

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-03/fact-check-are-drug-dogs-incorrect-75-pc-of-the-time/10568410

This real world effectiveness is far lower than lab controlled confirmation that yes, the dogs are able to smell drugs. That doesn't mean they are a reliable reason for police action since they can be following the officer's cues or smelling residual smells when the person doesn't have drugs on them.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's a classic detection theory problem. In this case, pretty much every false alarm doesn't make it to court since the dogs come out before you are ever arrested, and missed detections are also not recorded. So unless cops are actually keeping records on false alarms there's really no way to prosecute this.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

And they'd never collect that date because it would show the low accuracy and they'd lose the pretext for further investigation or arrests.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why can't the efficacy of these dogs be tested in a lab, just like a clinical drug trial? 100 dogs, 50 shown box containing drugs. 50 shown placebo, handler and lab tech don't know which is which. Then see whether the drugs outperform placebo in getting the dogs to alert.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It's not that it can't, it's that it won't. Drug dogs are one of the tools of oppression used by the police.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately they can just say there might have been residual traces of narcotics leading to a positive alert. It doesn't matter that it leads to the search/seizure of an innocent person.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well that’s a federal crime, assuming they’re being shipped by the USPS.

Lock them up.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you mean that mailing abortion pills is a federal crime, or that interfering with the mail is a federal crime?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Interfering with the US mail is a federal crime. Further, even in states that have banned medicated abortions; both medications have perfectly valid uses outside of abortion (including things not related specifically to women's health altogether.) Neither the USPS nor the cop can know if the drugs are for illegal purposes without filing subpoenas and warrants for that medical information; and probable cause is going to be difficult to get, considering.

It's also a federal crime to interfere with interstate commerce, which is solely the province of the federal government to regulate. Additionally, USPS screen for illegal substances anyway; maybe not every package, but enough to suggest that there shouldn't be local bastards screening them too.

Edit to add: Screwdrivers are commonly used tools for breaking in, they’re way more useful than lockpick sets, for example, and they can be used as a weapon, too.

Possessing a screwdriver, or even carrying one, is not suspicious or illegal. It wouldn’t give a cop probable cause. For that they need other things; this is similar. Having a medication is not sufficient for suspicion. Even having been pregnant is not suspicious; since they’re also used to manage a pregnancy that has failed for other reasons.

In short these asshats need to stop being asshats.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Ironically, I always carry lockpicks on me.

[–] Observer1199@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Or someone can let the dogs out. And we can ask "who?"

[–] CityPop@lemmy.today 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The dog isn't doing anything wrong. Most of the time they just alert based on subtle handler behavior anyway.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dogs "alerting" has as much grounding in truth as a polygraph test.

Polygraph results are not admissable in court, FYI.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We need an rct where the clinic sends abortion pills to some people and placebo pills to others. Or even to the same person in separate identical packages. Then see if the dogs alert more on the abortion pills or not.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Which is likely in this case since the envelope did not contain any narcotics.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

This is the future a quarter of Americans are fighting for.

Now if we could just get the other 3/4 out to vote...

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seems like a good use of taxpayer money...

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

This is why truffles are still so goddamn expensive. These pigs need to work within their scope

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Darknet markets have been dealing with drug-sniffing dogs for years. You can wrap the drugs enough that even dogs won't smell it.

This only worked because the dealers had no reason to expect it.

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

But education is just a waste of money

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The dog has been meaning to tell you something but you didn’t catch the hint.