stupidcasey

Bad clown, he should have blown him up first, he is nothing more than a condom animal now.

Frank? Are you alright? That’s a window?

I know.

Oh, frank, I love you too.

Jedi:

    I can sense the future.

Anakin:

   Really?! What are tomorrows lottery numbers?

Jedi:

  Clouded is your destiny.

Anakin:

  Oh, ok… why didn’t you guys know about that clone army?

Jedi:

  Hmmm, unclear this is.

Anakin:

   I see, so the reason you couldn’t tell me my mother was dying or what Count Dooku was up to, or me and Padme are married?

Jedi:

   The dark side clouds everything.

Anakin:

   Ok, how about this, you let me on the council or I tell the senate that the Jedi are a bunch of frauds.

Jedi:

  You are on this council but we do not grant you the rank of master.

I would argue that the people who showed up to vote is a perfectly random selection of people who would have shown up to vote if you extrapolate the numbers out under identical circumstances for each city town district state, etc , I would also concede that the sheer increase in voters would affect who votes, I would not how ever say this alters my conclusion because there is no way to know what way it would alter them making it another random variable.

That is why you would apply it to each district not the entire county.

It is obviously true with a 500/1 trillion ratio, but a 100/100,000 is a big difference and that is just the random number I chose the actual ratio is closer to 88/334 (88 million people who didn’t vote. 334 million population)

The 500/1 Trillion in the central limit theorem is the absolutely most optimistic exaggeration to prove a point, but it maintains true to a lesser effect when some variation is introduced.

I just assume anything overly verbose or well structured is Ai written and gloss over it.

No, that is true as long as all external factors remain constant, if X went off the air and suddenly we have a decrease of republican’s the ratio would change, however if both sides pushed harder and got more total voters it would stay consistent.

Oh no, that’s not what I’m saying at all, it is %100 biased but changing the total number of voters will not change which direction is biased to.

Yes but increasing the total amount of votes don’t affect the ratio

Statistically it doesn’t matter The central limit theorem, would allow for a sample size as small as 500 people randomly distributed to be an accurate representation of a group of trillions, it is a bit more complicated than that since the us is not random but carefully crafted districts, but as long as 50-100 people voted is each district or even the majority of districts then adding more people is just redundant.

The real reason gamers don’t have sex, the price is just too high.