this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
171 points (96.2% liked)

Offbeat

1264 readers
62 users here now

The world is a weird place filled with even weirder news.

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Lemmy.ca Rules

Community Rules

Similar Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/Itw5D

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 month ago
[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is terrible.

Aluminium cans should have gone in the recycling! ♻️

[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You guys have recycling?

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's just trash with extra steps!

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Aluminum is actually one of the most recyclable things we have. To the point where it's better, environmentally, to have single use aluminum cups that get recycled every time.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And in contrast, plastic sucks 100% for recycling. Remelting it for recycling results in polymer degradation. Going so far as to be basically useless for some cases. We tried a bunch of high quality recycled materials - for instance ground up and repelletized lego bricks. Bumpers from cars. All abs, all possible to be broken by hand when extruded. New pellets never had that and could basically withstand everything we threw at them. What people usually do is mix like 5% of recycled into the new stuff.

The cost of plastic is so cheap, that I could have ordered a metric tonne, use up 50kgs out of that, throw the remaining 950kg out and still turn a healthy profit. It always surprised me why someone would make something out of shitty plastic, when the good stuff is barely more expensive. It also surprises me why people bother with recycling it for the exact same reason. The drawbacks are huge for maybe 5 - 10% difference in cost.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Plastic is basically free. It's a waste product from refining oil. That's why it's so cheap. Instead of telling the petroleum industry they needed to properly deal with their hazardous waste we let them sell it. It would be like a coal mine finding a use for the chemical soup that remains after processing, and then just yeeting it everywhere.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

For some products it is fine that the plastic is not pure virgin material, like traffic cones. That 10% savings might be what keeps a company profitable, and new oil wasn't needed. A lot of plastic goes to fuel pellets too. Not great, but better than new oil

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except aluminium cans nowadays have a plastic lining that make recycling them harder.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm talking about straight up aluminum cups. No need for the can liner.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Beer can artwork temporarily made interactive.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

To be fair, I feel like that's kind of what the artist was hoping for. Would you be reading about his piece if some Philistine with no concept of what constitutes art hadn't thrown it away?

[–] Clasm@ttrpg.network 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Art exists solely as it is interpreted by the observer.

In this case, the observer interrupted the art as trash.

[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago

I believe this kind of art should embrace the impermanence. The concept is more valuable than the object.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

I mean, that makes it a pretty damn successful work.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

There was another story like this. The exhibit depicts an after party scene with champagne bottles and other party "trash" everywhere. It was placed in a room. The custodians thought there was a party earlier and promptly cleaned the room.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That title is a garden path sentence! I was like beer can artwork? Is that grammar correct?

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If beer can artwork, then so can you!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I am beer can artwork!

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

I don't want to be canned

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Yea, headline writers are often... Casual.

It should be something like "Beer-can art" with it without the quotes (I'm not sure, really).

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 8 points 1 month ago

The idea that someone'd think someone'd littered like that in a museum tickles me a bit.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Good times are symbolized by littering alcohol cans?

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

tbh i would have thrown it away even if i knew it was "art"

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds like museums and art centers aren't your thing.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 month ago

i love museums and art centers.

the great thing about art is everyone is free to define it how they want, and no one is wrong.

"art" to you, "garbage" to me