this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
407 points (97.9% liked)

News

23182 readers
3226 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk’s X is now worth less than a quarter of its $44 billion purchase price, according to a new estimate from investor Fidelity. 

The asset manager, which helped Musk acquire the social network formerly known as Twitter, now values its stake in X at approximately $4.19 million, based on newly released disclosures from Fidelity’s Blue Chip Growth Fund. The fund has reduced the value of its holding in X by a total of 78.7% as of August end.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 56 points 2 weeks ago

Keep going.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wow, a loss of 79%. Space Karen should be so proud.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

But you see, he was high and his opinions were being censored by those evil SF leftists

/s

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I’m convinced space Karen hasn’t gone up in one of his rockets like the other billionaires because the memes calling for it to explode would be so pervasive he’d have to admit to himself that he is truly hated

[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

A part of me thinks that some of this is deliberate- like once it was clear he was going to have to follow up with the twitter deal the places/people that funded him did so on the condition that he tank it.

I know that's insane but I really am struggling to see how anyone could commit this many public fuckups unintentionally.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

I've been waiting for him to find some way to turn the loss into a bailout for a year now. If there's one thing he's good at it's robbing the public.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not certain that it was an explicit condition negotiated with Musk, but I'm sure his investors had full confidence in his ability to do it anyway :)

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry, Musk is really just this incompetent, and our society allows people to fail upwards in this manner.

The people at the top didn't do anything unique to deserve being up there. The meritocracy is a lie - Musk proves it.

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

I heard he's a ketamine addicted

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds overpriced.

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The fact that it hasn’t lost 100% of its value is news to me. Hopefully his government contracts get cancelled as well.

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well, space x at least works well

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

How to make a small fortune in social media:

Step 1: invest a large fortune into social media

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is why you shouldn't put your money into human-managed mutual funds.

Humans make idiotic decisions like helping Musk buy Twitter.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What's the alternative? AI is telling people to eat glue so that isn't a viable option imo. I don't think anything else exists that isn't human managed, although I'm not entirely sure what you mean by that.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Funds managed by pure numbers. Index funds for example

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You'll never guess how indices are created

[–] zabadoh@ani.social -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] zabadoh@ani.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not like the S&P500 committee is going to make wild and crazy decisions based on a hunch. It's still very much based on replacing older shrinking companies with newer more vigorous representatives in the same industry.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Still, it's not just mathematics, humans are making decisions on what companies to add or remove from the indices in a majority of cases.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Funds managed by cats I suppose.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Too many people are still tied into its stocks, so they overvalue it to prevent them from panic selling it and showing what’s its truly worth. $0

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

He told advertisers to fuck off. It appears many took him up on the offer.

Loses revenue, shocked Pikachu.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 12 points 2 weeks ago

They really outdid themselves with that cover art :D

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At that rate of wealth incineration he may be the Xer trump which makes me worried about future republican presidential canidates more.

[–] Naboo_calls_for_aid@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just be glad musk can't run, seems enough people are oblivious to his idiocy

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know I might be turned around on him. Yeah hes a piece of shit intent wise but we we need to actually look what someone has accomplished. Wealth disparity is one of of the biggest problems of modern time and here he has gone and evaporated over 35 billion from the high end. He might be the greatest hero of the common man in our time. /s

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This, but no /s. He's evaporated $35 billion from Twitter and is convincing conservatives to buy electric vehicles. I might like him about as much as I'd like a tick on my nutsack, but he is accomplishing things that align with my goals.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Like getting people to vote for a fascist dictator or attempting to incite civil war in the UK (and soon US)

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Somehow I’m not as confident they wouldn’t figure out a way to ignore just one more law

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty sure the states could refuse to have him on the ballot, which would fuck over his ability to do jack shit. Also never underestimate American xenophobia, the fact he is South African would probably be enough to get him deported if it went to say a jury.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure the states could refuse to have him on the ballot

Like Colorado tried to when Trump was convicted of massive fraud?

If the cult latches onto Musk after Trump croaks, the corrupt SCOTUS majority isn't going to let pesky details like the constitution get in his way either.

the fact he is South African would probably be enough to get him deported

He's got triple citizenship, one of which being American making him much harder to deport.

Personally I'd love for him to fulfill his dream of dying on Mars, except without his "but not on impact" caveat, as soon as possible.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

On impact would be one of the best ways to go on Mars.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Competitive failure race between trump and musk.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think anything tops Trump bankrupting a casino. Twatter has always run at a loss Muskrat just accelerated that burn rate exponentially.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

How about three casinos, two casino holding companies and a hotel?

I'm pretty sure if you handed me all those I would be actually incapable of fucking them over as hard as Trump did. Like, even if I actively tried. He is such poison to everything that the buildings that print money with no effort just stopped printing money under his command.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)

[–] HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I saw a video online by an "ex" CIA agent saying that the way the US spies on its citizens isn't through shady espionage like wire tapping and private investigators. The FBI merely goes to info corporations like Google, AT&T, Facebook, etc. and buys the user's information. I think that was an underlying goal of Musk's. He wanted the user info on people that were using Twitter for political purposes worldwide. The value of Twitter wasn't just it's monetary value, but the power that came with owning that information.