this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
610 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38607 readers
3082 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian President Vladimir Putin has suffered an emabarassing setback as his feared Satan 2 nuclear arsenal failed four out of five missile tests, according to arms experts and satellite imagery from the launch site.

High-resolution satellite images of the launch pad at Russia's Plesetsk test site, where the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile exploded, shows extensive damage.

A crater approximately 60 meters wide at the launch silo at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia, along with visible damage in the surrounding area that was not present in images taken earlier in the month.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 54 minutes ago

Nobody would care if NATO hadn't named this thing Satan. Propaganda works.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Satan 2? What is this high school missile competition?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 57 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago) (1 children)

Almost. It's NATO propaganda.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 35 minutes ago

Calling something that's not good to have delivered to you after a figurative evil being.. yea buddy that sure is some propaganda.

You act as if the actual 'weapon' is designed to re-seed old growth forests and clean aquifers instead of vaporize a sizable chunk of people/buildings.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

'Satan 2 missile'

"Ivan, are we the baddies?"

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago) (1 children)

Yes, the people in NATO who make up these propaganda terms are also bad people.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Why are you covering for the fascist government of Russia?

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 3 points 35 minutes ago

Dude is a fascist cunt, what do you expect?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 12 hours ago

How many L's is this man giving himself?

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

is russia testing nuclear arms again?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

US tested a Minuteman III missile out of Vandenberg earlier this year. It was not carrying a nuclear payload. It's fairly common for countries to test missiles. Some countries broadcast their intent publicly so as not to accidentally trigger a retaliatory launch. Others don't broadcast publicly, but they do communicate via the good-old-boy net for the same reason.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

This may be off topic, but I absolutely loved reading about Minuteman III guidance system.

And unlike all those "missiles by subscription and good behavior" that many big countries sell to smaller countries, it doesn't rely on any satellite system or external corrections after launch.

BTW, I wonder what's inside Russian ICBMs. People often say that all the Russian big cool projects in defense after breakup of the USSR are just finished Soviet projects. If that is true, there must be an awfully complex, but geek-porn-ish thing inside, possibly with analog and maybe even mechanical elements. If that is not, it's still interesting. Right now yes, Russian military engineering relies on many foreign (NATO countries produced in fact) components. But that didn't become a thing immediately, so I wonder how did they solve problems.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Hey Russia, we're launching a nuke missle with the nuke removed in your direction. Just testing we swear!

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Sort of. The ICBM rocket delivery system.

The US is developing a new ICBM as well.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

ok so they're not "testing nuclear payloads" then. That's good to know. I was confused as to what they meant with the title.

If they ever do test nuclear payloads, thats going to be a nightmare.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The US at least regularly tests its missiles. They shoot from California toward a Pacific island into a painted target.

Modern ICBMs are insanely accurate.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Ya but not with a nuclear nomb just a dummy payload.

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think a single soul on this planet was actually afraid of it. In fact, most people theorized this EXACT thing would happen.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

That's what happens when you start the war, people who have the capabilities to build it are also the first to get out of the country

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who would have thought that simply robbing an entire nation and giving all the proceeds to your corrupt friends would lead to an inability to manufacture practically everything? TIL

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wonder how China feels having a North Korea on both sides of its country.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

Hey, north Korea’s nuclear missiles work

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 day ago (10 children)

ok slightly unrelated but the satellite pictures have an insane resolution for having been taken from, you know, space

The pics

Just imagine what the government has if that's what's available commercially to the public

for one thing, it's mostly just lensing, and for another, it's also partially due to the atmosphere of the earth actually working in tandem with the lensing of the satellites themselves. Dont ask me how it works but from what i understand, seeing out from earth is harder, but seeing in from space is easy. Something to do with the way that light refraction in the atmosphere works or something.

the weirdest thing about telescopes (essentially what these are), is that you can just put a hole in them, and they'll still work just fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlan_J._Smith_Telescope#Vandalism_damage

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›