this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
1191 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9643 readers
268 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Work by Ron Cobb

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 82 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (21 children)

While I can afford it, I intentionally have the smallest, most efficient vehicle I can possibly get away with owning while still meeting my mandatory social requirement of having a vehicle.

Due to a lack of public transportation, it is required. There’s no other practical means I can use to do the 45 minute commute to work, short of perhaps buying a motorcycle which puts me at risk due to the predominance of huge SUVs. I’ve considered an E bike, but we don’t even have sidewalks on this route.

I just can’t swallow investing in something that either sits outside or sits in traffic. I don’t use half of what that little four banger is capable of.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I always wondered that. Like why have 400 hpwr if there is no opportunity to use it.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fast cars are fun to drive (if you are blissfully ignorant of how dangerous speeding is), but knowing what I know now, it is scary how easy it is to drive a fast car recklessly. I don't have a source at hand, but I'd bet money that high HP cars kill children and pedestrians at higher rates than small eco cars do.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

And trucks are just fast cars with worse handling and braking, and worse outcomes for bystanders in accidents.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As someone who has a big guilty pleasure for sports/performance cars and racing in general, this comic actually explains really well how I'm able to reconcile that with my dislike of car-centric infrastructure and wishing for better public transportation: without other means for getting around cities for people who don't care much about cars (i.e. most people), everyone will be forced to use cars for basic transport, meaning really clogged highways and traffic jams that directly affect you and your fancy sports car's enjoyment.

Conversely, if infrastructure was more accommodating for bikes, trains and buses to make them more viable, most people would use them, leaving the streets and highways freer for you to have fun driving your sports car the way it was meant to, instead of being stuck in traffic jams most of the time.

I just wish most people who are into cars realized this, instead of raving about how "they want to take away our cars!" and fellating Andrew Tate and other shitheads.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Why aren't sport cars rented instead of sold? Only place you can really use them is the race track.

[–] Two2Tango@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lots of racetracks sell packages like this, pay $$ to take out a certain car or groups of cars. But for lots of people it's just as much about the tuning/improving of their own car as it is about the driving.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Au contraire, my Fuck Cars fellow. A sports car's agile handling and peppy acceleration are enjoyable even at street legal speeds. They are of course most enjoyable when driven nearer to the limits at a track, but most stock "sports cars" require some modifications to be reliably driven under such intense conditions.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I feel like a more accurate (though much less catchy) name for this community would be !fuckcarcentricsociety. Cars are awesome! They're fun to drive, feats of engineering, and in the right conditions like a rollercoaster without tracks. They just fucking suck when they're practically required to live. I'm as big a proponent for public transit, you shouldn't need a car to get to your job or grocery store, but you can't look at something like F1 and say that's not exhilarating.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

but you can’t look at something like F1 and say that’s not exhilarating.

strong disagree. perhaps in the 60s and 70s - before we understood that ICE was spewing carbon dioxide and ruining the ecosystem sure.

Today? F1 is a fucking travesty - rich assholes burning crazy amounts of fuel to speed around in circles taking more from future generations every fucking lap.

If it were all electric powered by renewable resources harvested nearby I'd have less of an issue, but anything combusting is a giant middle finger to your own children. "Sorry skippy, even we knew, we still didn't give a fuck to stop the silly games."

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Today? F1 is a fucking travesty - rich assholes burning crazy amounts of fuel to speed around in circles taking more from future generations every fucking lap.

While I don't disagree that spectating races is boring, the amount of CO2 those put out pale in comparison to commutator traffic or the container ships running bunker fuel. We could have EV races and if each manufacturer entered their base models, could help with adoption. We could also make the ICE races run biogas(methane from antibiotic digesters) or biodiesel(tractor pulls could easily adopt that with only a small lowering of performance that all the tractors would share).

but anything combusting is a giant middle finger to your own children.

All consumption is.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (14 children)

I agree the environmental impacts are certainly an issue, but the emissions from the sport alone aren't that bad, the worst is from all the travel done on private jets between locations. They've also done some work towards being more eco-friendly. The cars run hybrid V6s instead of V10s and by 2026 will use fully renewable biofuel. There's also Formula E, which is an entirely electric motorsport.

There's just some things an ICU can do that an electric motor can't. It's simply impossible to get the same amount of power as an F1 car from purely electric propulsion at the same weight.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not even car centric in the US or you would have way more roundabouts instead of traffic lights.

I don't know what the US is, but it's shitty for everyone, including cars. The difference is, that cars are comfortable to sit in, but the actual driving is a nightmare compared to Europe. (And walking half a mile in the summer sun from the car to the stadium on a concrete parking lot should be attributed to car centric infrastructure too).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Alternative opinion:
Car companies should stop making normal cars and instead only make hardcore vehicles. I'm talking race cars that are challenging and uncomfortable to drive.
manual only, aggressive clutches, loud gears, stiff suspension, non-adjustable seat, no heat, no ac, no radio, etc.

Then while they're making this change we expand the shit out of mass transport and infrastructure!

I can assure you that nobody wants to daily drive my race car. lol

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (12 children)

I want all of those things. I can assure you, I want to drive a V8 loud as fuck, manual thick clutched, wide tired, non AC, non radio, rear wheel drive, fucking street menace of a vehicle.

But I also want an absolute rehaul of our infrastructure to include high speed rail for the entire country, and comprehensive pricing that is subsidized by the government with my tax money and provided for free if I need it.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago (10 children)

As someone whose only car is a Honda S2000... yeah kinda.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The groceries in the passenger seat are a nice touch, because of course there's gonna be no trunk space.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Instead of a macho man forging their destiny, it is a woman, given that it is the 70s, likely a housewife, coming home from grocery shopping.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love the groceries in the front seat because there's no room anywhere else.

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Even though some sort of trunk or storage could totally fit without increasing the vehicle volume.

[–] Doxatek@mander.xyz 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How I felt last week in my busted up 350k miles shitbox when there was a Lamborghini and Ferrari beside me crawling through traffic. Even once we were out of gridlock their average speed was probably the exact same as mine. My car costs probably 500 dollars and there's cost literally a 1000 times more than that. Made me feel good. Also made me feel like ramming them just because

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As it turns out, road speed is limited by laws, safety and traffic, not the HP of your car engine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's what I tell people. The reality of driving sucks. You might be in love with your fantasy of a 500 HP beast, but

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

meanwhile on an open mountain road on a Sunday afternoon

"Woooooo!!!!!"

Where you're driving is as important as what. You'd love to drive a Civic Type R.

In a hospital? Maybe not.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

1969 and it is still relevant.

[–] orl0pl@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The slowest common denominator decides how much man you are heh

load more comments
view more: next ›