this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
60 points (92.9% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3520 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 44 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You’d have to be a special type of moron to trust Trump on the economy. Or anything else for that matter.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 23 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Besides the fact that macro- and microeconomics are vastly different, his multiple bankruptcies should give you ample evidence that economy is the last thing to trust him on. It's amazing how little facts matter, and how many people take him at his word. I never realised ActLikeYouBelong would work on this scale, but apparently just claiming you're a genius billionaire is enough for millions of people.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

One of the geniuses in /conservative kept trying to say that Trump never declared bankruptcy; it was his businesses that were bankrupt.

It's almost hilarious how far they'll stretch to defend Donny Dipshit.

That's what the GOP has been doing for decades. Insisting that they're the party of fiscal responsibility despite the fact that they're just not good at managing the economy.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 11 hours ago

I would assume the inability to complete a single sentence would be a tell way before you get into the skill carryover between micro and macroeconomics. But then we're way past being surprised that anybody could look at this guy and go "ah, behold, a functional candidate to elected office".

The “trust” gap is that Trump will absolutely tax rich people less… but if the pie is smaller because Trump is busy putting the economy in a nosedive, you’re gonna make less money anyways. So it’s better to keep a smaller portion of a bigger pie.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I think describing Trumps insane tariff plan as a sales tax was a genius way of framing a subject that many voters don't understand. I hope that peeled off some people who looked into it afterwards.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 12 hours ago

Axios - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Axios:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.axios.com/2024/09/19/harris-trump-economy-trust-survey
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support