So, they want to add "not for EU" to products that are basically perfectly fine and legal to sell in the EU, because, why exactly? Some kind of weird reverse protectionism?
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
28 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
1482 readers
602 users here now
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
(This list may get expanded when necessary.)
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
Because the UK chose to not be a part of the single market anymore, so goods they UK wish to export into the EU needs to be treated like any other 3rd country goods with checks and certifications to prove that they are good enough, but with NI still part of the single market as well as the UK, this label was the best solution they could come up with to avoid having to check everything going from the UK to NI. Without the label trade friction will be lower between Ireland and NI, which will please republicans, but not unionists I think.
To avoid tensions and economic issues, the Ireland/Northern Ireland border doesn't have border controls or import duties. However, that means you have to prevent goods that cannot be imported into EU unrestricted from leaving Northern Ireland somehow (otherwise, people will start businesses that systematically circumvent duties). The solution the UK government has chosen here are "not for EU" labels.
But the thing is, those products CAN be imported to the EU just fine. Not without paying and having them checked, but they can.
Of course, with this label, they become basically unsellable in the EU, which is something of a solution I guess?
Government plans to force food manufacturers to put “not for EU” labels on all meat and dairy products sold across Britain next month have been indefinitely postponed after warnings that the scheme could cause “chaos” for producers and suppliers.