this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
139 points (91.1% liked)

196

16238 readers
1713 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _Sprite@lemmy.world 55 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

She's going to fuck that spider.

[–] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

her name is days?

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 days ago

Ne, echt nicht

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is similar to a classic, very not safe for work gif involving a woman dressed as a spider.

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

If you really want it, I can send it to you directly, or you can find it by googling "spider blowjob creepy" or something like that. (I specifically say "googling" because I was unsuccessful in finding it on DDG. I didn't try other search engines.)

I don't know what the gif's origin is, but it was semi frequently posted on Reddit. To shamefully continue referencing Reddit, this probably wouldn't be your proudest fap. (I originally said "I can assure you" but then again ... You did request the gif and I don't know you.)

edit: Improved my originally very cavalier approach to grammar. Did not change the message of the post.

spoileredit 2: Apparently the appeal of this was more widespread than I thought. I didn't want to post it publicly because I don't know how all of the clients handle image previews and didn't want to force the image on anyone; also I couldn't validate the quality or security of the website I found when searching it, but if you really want to see a spider blowing a guy, here it is.

[–] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, that's a thing on the internet apparently. Neat. -_-

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not sure "neat" is the word I'd use. Its existence doesn't upset me, but I wouldn't mind if it didn't exist.

[–] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Neat in the macabre sense. Because while it's disturbing for sure, it's interesting someone put that much effort into production effort of such a thing.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well, hard to argue with that.

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Sure, send it!

[–] Dave2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Could you send it to me too

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Omg, I remember that masterpiece. That mix of high effort effects and poorly lit porn would still be hard to pull off today.

litterally me