this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
122 points (98.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26916 readers
1734 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 94 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

anything that was shot in 3D was fucking amazing, if you where underwhelmed it was because you watched some flat post production 2D conversion cash grab garbage, which I assume was the case for most people since no one makes 3D televisions anymore (yes, I know projectors are still being made with 3D capabilities)

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I bought a 3D TV and liked watching movies on it. Agree that being shot in 3D is better, but anything released in 3D in theaters was good enough.

I don't know why they died. Too bad. Did streaming kill 3D perhaps?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 32 points 2 months ago

movies are inherently passive entertainment and the friction of needing glasses for everyone watching was probably enough to kill it for the average user. I think some people got headaches from the effect too and you couldn't really have some people watching without glasses at the same time.

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The glorified pop-up books killed 3D. That's most of what people saw, so that was their perception of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ashiette@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I never was able to see in 3D because my eyes can't bloody focus to produce stereoscopic images. 3D movies were hell for me and there was nothing amazing about the headaches it gave me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArkhamNightshift@lemmy.world 77 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Google glass. Sounded like we'd all be wearing these glasses that we'd not be able to do without, but even looking back that sounds like such a poor idea. I try to not be on my phone as much as I can, I can't imagine wearing glasses with an interface in my direct vision constantly, especially when a lot of it would be shit like emails, LinkedIn notifications of people I might know, and my siblings sending me 12 Instagram posts in a row.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Would've been awesome for maps though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I wanted to be like the kid from Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide and have a mouse wired up to it. Lol.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] cdf12345@lemm.ee 65 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The first Segway.

They’re were quotes that cities would be designed around this invention. Before it was announced it was a balancing standup scooter.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was legitimately sad it didn't take off. It was a really cool piece of tech but it got mocked for being nerdy or geeky.

I wonder how much of that was encouraged by oil and car companies.

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 44 points 2 months ago (7 children)

But... Bikes? How does it improve on bikes, other than being much less safe and more expensive?

Crazy futurists could even propose we build cities around bikes.. but that would be insane, obviously. 🚙

[–] cron@feddit.org 22 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I feel that an electric bicycle is better than a segway in every single aspect.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Yes. The "Ginger"/"It" hype was off the charts. People were legitimately wondering if it was going to be some sort of jet pack or something.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 61 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Spicy take: high speed Internet (specifically high-speed) and cell phones.

What the fuck am I smoking?

Listen. Look around you. People expect for you to be connected 24/7. Your boss, your friends, family, they all expect you to be connected nowadays. Hell, Australia had to pass a law stopping employers from contacting you outside of work hours.

Then everyone has an opinion and they all want to share it (me too!), and if you don't have an opinion, you're a fucking weirdo, a dirty centrist, ignorant, or many other things (you're probably a Nazi or something, shithead).

Social media is designed to make you feel like shit and you're antisocial if you're not on some social media site.

Everyone is depressed and tormented by the constant flow of negative information on their pocket squares that they feel obligated to subject themselves to, all because someone they care about will get mad or be disappointed if they don't know or have an opinion about everything that happens every second of every minute of every hour of every day. I have a pocket square (which I'm using right now) because I feel like I have to have one nowadays. A significant amount of this is enabled by widespread high-speed Internet. Some of it would still exist, but a lot of it would become unfeasible due to the Internet being too slow. Doesn't matter if you have some crazy 32core phone with 64gb of ram and 2tb of ssd storage if you're limited to T-1 speeds or slower.

Sigh I'm doing the "old enby yells at clouds" thing aren't I?

Yes, the Internet is great and has done a lot of good things, and quite honestly, at the end of the day I honestly think it's done more good than bad. But I also think it's massively overrated at this point.

Cell phones kinda fit into the same category of, "everyone expects you to always be reachable"; and with the same conclusion (still good but overrated). I don't know how I feel about non-cellular tablets.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like it's extremely overwhelming, in a bad way. Wouldn't call all that "underwhelming".

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 13 points 2 months ago

Perhaps it's just whelming.

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

The side effects of an amazing technology.....but the technology is still amazing. I wouldn't interpret it as overrated at all.

When something comes along that can be misused so easily, then it takes a conscious effort to avoid misuse. It's the same with cars, processed foods, or any modern innovation really. Be the change you want to see. Reject social media. Turn off pretty much every phone notification. Have screen free time. Socialise without screens. I'm trying to do all these things. It's difficult when no one else is interested in following suit and I just get excluded when I'm not on the platforms everyone else uses.....but I'm trying to gather a circle of people who are aligned in this way of living.

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@fedia.io 8 points 2 months ago

@MossyFeathers@pawb.social

You make a very good point. Things aren't black and white and because something has produced Benefits, it doesn't mean that it has only positive consequences.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] esc27@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago (3 children)

VR - It has been through a few hype cycles, but never quite makes it. Cost, weight, battery life (or tethers), lack of highly desirable games, required floor space, nausea (in some people), etc.

Starlink - when announced it sounded like the solution to ISP monopolies and rural broadband access. But the roll out was so slow that other solutions have caught up. For people with no option other than satellite internet, it is still great (if they can get it) but for a lot of people, better options now exist.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Also, it's way overpriced tbh. Sure I get that it's internet from space and all but I just see the price keep rising instead of dropping over time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They are great if you don't care whether they are accurate at any given point in time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Self-driving cars
I bought into the hype 10ish years ago. I had expected it to revolutionise road transport.

[–] Poik@pawb.social 16 points 2 months ago

Realistically. Trains will revolutionize road transport of goods and people if the train industry properly maintained their rails, operated above board (unlike the one that had the chemical spill in Ohio and other issues), and expands a bit. The largest expense in good transport is long haul and no one wants to drive long haul. Last mile will probably need trucks and drivers for at least 3 to 5 more decades. And taxi services have similar challenges to last mile delivery. Personal self driving systems need even more consideration than taxi services, and will likely take five to ten years after taxi services become recognized as safe.

[–] Poik@pawb.social 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In my (in the industry) experience: Agile killed safe development by pushing superficial internal deadlines that look good instead of are good. Safety requirements therefore are never met, but people keep looking like they're approaching at least one, but end up sacrificing other things that no one is concentrating on, causing more set backs than improvements. Self driving will not be legally commercialized until either someone lobbies bad development onto the roads, or capitalism realizes that quarter profit isn't as important as ten year profit and Agile finally burns in a god damn fire.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] simple@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It would have been good if they didn't lie so much about what you can do with it and fail spectacularly

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Seems only the influencers took the bait. And then they returned it once the channel had its run. Anyone know of any real world users/ uses for it?

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 10 points 2 months ago

Probably nothing beyond normal VR stuff. It's still pretty new and it sounds like Apple is still trying to figure out the chicken or the egg problem when it comes to developing an entirely new platform and have decided to try putting the egg first to see if anyone will incubate it for them. Who knows if they'll commit long enough for it to pay off. Tbh I can see VR enthusiasts still getting something out of it since it sounds like people have figured out how to get it working with steamvr. Other than that though, I don't really see any uses for it. I think they're going to have to spend a lot of time looking for problems that are worth paying $1,000~$2,000 to solve (I'm assuming that's what a "consumer" version would cost), and then refine their solution until it feels natural before widespread adoption will be a thing.

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s actually got traction in industry where we were already exploring AR for things like using 3d models to enhance maintenance on large facility equipment.

Compared to the value prop of increased reliability and enhanced frontline accessibility of consumable model data its cost is not a barrier and its quality is a MASSIVE step up from the equipment we had.

I’ve heard about it being used in high cost per unit sales experiences too, like jets or whatnot, it haven’t seen that directly.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

I recall talking to a vendor back... 8 years ago? Who had a colleague trialling hololens augmented maintenance. I personally felt it would be amazing to be able to look at equipment, bring up a model and explode it to get a look at (Yeah I know you can do that with a laptop, manufacturing lines have notoriously shitty wifi, not to mention greasy around equipment), assisted procedures were a cool idea too, helps people who may not be super familiar with your specific equipment, like shift or loaner maintenance people.

Over a decade ago, different company, they had a bounty on video procedures, you'd strap a go pro to your head and record something like changing batteries, replacing o-rings, removal of electronics etc for a cash bonus. I'm a text and photo person but I totally see the value in video documentation.

Microsoft had a demo at an ignite conference in 2020 if I recall of hololens doing ar metrics, person looked at things like the elevator and would give them real-time performance data, definitely a gimmick but I still think AR could be useful in an industrial setting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cron@feddit.org 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Foldable phones - at least the early generations hat lots of troubles with the hinges and scratched screens.

Still as of today, testers are undecided if these category of devices really has a benefit compared to just buying both a tablet and a phone (and still saving money).

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The people yearn for flip phones

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (12 children)

I was very excited one year to get an early Roomba vacuum. It looked so fun and convenient.

I wouldn't say it was bad, but it was very meh compared to the high hopes I had.

It went in a senseless pattern without setting up the electronic boundaries. It had trouble docking. It filled up very fast and had to be manually emptied. It was loud and slow. It just overall felt like it took longer and required more manual handling and maintenance than a regular upright and couldn't even clean everything, so I still had to vacuum.

On top of that, the battery died after about a year. I got an expensive rebuild with supposed better cells from a local reman company, and that died again in about a year. The new battery was more than the Roomba was worth by then, so I gave up on it.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

At least now they have ones where the base station cleans out the robot. The old style was basically not worth it. It vaccums by itself but then you have to clean the little compartment out which is sorta more annoying than just vaccuming yourself. It was only useful when you literally needed to be able to do two things at once which was what I needed at the time as my wife had just had knee surgery and was laid up. so it would run cleaning up while I was getting her stuff or what not and when I did not have something else to do i could pick them up and clean them out.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 22 points 2 months ago

These ones I think had drummed up a lot of hype but failed to deliver:

  • "ai" a.k.a. "Plagiarized Info Synth System". the magic is gone. it doesn't make decisions. hallucinations show how limited it can and doesn't match how it was marketed.

  • "smart" cars. all the powers (and tracking) of smart phone apps inside your car.

    • "smart" ref/ fridge/ icebox. plays skyrim. supposedly orders for you when eggs go out of stock. tracking. dedj in a year or so.

    • "smart" tv. more ads. more tracking.

  • NFT. owning the "receipt" of a digital resource is a funny idea. as long as you aren't the one owning.

    • digital ownership. those online and cloud libraries of your music, books, etc. I have seen news of amazon, steam, and others de-listing items here. if you own one of those, they're gone.
  • "google+". touted fb-killer. nobody was there.

    • which leads to: any google product that was scrapped. because google killed it.
  • hyperloop. vaporware. I mean, we can dream.

below are products that are solely in my opinion and YMMV:

  • 4D movies. oh, seat is vibrating. i got wet.

  • 1gb/2gb/4gb internet. promises up to advertised speeds. flat payment as if said speed was delivered.

  • iphone. all the bright colors and jumping people on the ad. I don't see iphone owners being high as that. imo, the money i dropped on it is stockholming me -- i love it.

  • salad. what's all these girls smiling and laughing at their salad?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Blink Security Cameras.

Record for 30 seconds, then can’t record for the next 10. So you miss 25% of whatever’s going on at your house. Can’t add other users, so anyone you want to give view access to your cameras, you just have to give them your password, and thus, full access. No web UI, just the mobile app. No Home Assistant integration. Subscription required.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Segway scooter

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apple Vision Pro. It's incredible for the first days. Then there's no reason to keep using it.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Really? This sounded promising to anyone?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Except it didn't really sound promising

[–] anarchost@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'd say Tesla in general became a disappointment. The Cybertruck was just the blister on top.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›