this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
-11 points (26.1% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2629 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/Ev3AT

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Who doesn't have shitty trumpers in their family?

It's just one more thing Dem voters identify with honestly

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Exactly. They think it's a "gotcha" but my own parents are Trumpers/Fox News lovers. Oof. We all have those family members we roll our eyes at.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I essentially use it as a litmus test for whether I should have anything to do with you. I have several cousins that put themselves into this exclude category … very convenient of them to self-label as dumbasses.

I am open to alternative viewpoints. I have civil intelligent discussions with folks over various viewpoints. But no one, and I mean no one, who is still a Trump supporter, is someone I can have a rational discussion about anything. They’re in a cult. You might as well argue with a scientologist.

[–] JaymesRS 6 points 2 months ago

Sounds like these yahoos are descendants of Walz’ grandfather’s brother. Almost as big of a nothing burger as his estranged brother’s Facebook post that ended up being about Tim getting car sick as a kid.

It’s just all flailing to try and find anything and they can’t. It’s glorious.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheCelticPirate@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

These idiots can't even pluralize their name correctly.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Do they know there some pretty vocal Trump's for Harris, too?

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 2 points 2 months ago

TL;DR: no clue

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago

Forbes - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Forbes:

MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.forbes.com/sites/petersuciu/2024/09/04/walzs-for-trump-photo-has-gone-viral-on-x-real-or-ai-generated/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support