this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
187 points (99.5% liked)

Interesting Global News

2601 readers
379 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Guidelines also stipulate teenagers should have no more than three hours of screen time a day

Archived version: https://archive.ph/0293p

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fworld%2Farticle%2F2024%2Fsep%2F02%2Fno-screens-before-age-of-two-swedish-health-authority-tells-parents

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Green@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say that screens themselves damage attention spans or anything, but when the screen is the tool to deliver the lowest consumable content imaginable, cutting out the screens is the way to go.

This recommendation is understandable, but as with anything moderation is key. Not just in terms of how much screen time you allow, but the type of content they interact with.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yup.

I've got two kids, the amount of time they get consuming content is limited, the content they have access to is only from my media server (so very curated), and occasional extras like crafting/drawing/etc when we are sitting next to them. And even that I'm moving to the media server due to the ads, which are impossible to really curate and can be very, very odd...

The physical presence of a screen being on is not an issue. Using it as a replacement for parenting is an issue. Especially under 2.

I just wish it wasn't so much effort to manage content that other parents could do it more easily.

[–] Green@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We also have a media server, and I too wish it were easier to set up so more parents could have more control over the content viewed. As it is, I'm thinking to upgrade our machine so it can handle multiple streams both locally and from other houses.

The other parents we interact with like the concept of limited curation, but they lack the technical experience to get it set up and so they rely on Netflix, Prime, and Disney+. Maybe I'll get around to it this winter haha.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's what I do, nieces and nephews. They are a bit older than my kids, and their parents are not tech savvy.

I basically have a kids library for anything under PG, and I grab common sense media ratings for a decent estimate on appropriate age, and let them go from there. Then I use tags for what we find appropriate for our kids.

Some of them still use other things I wouldn't go near (YouTube kids, ffs that place is wild and weird), but that's their decision not mine.

FWIW I run mine off an 8th gen Intel, igpu for transcoding (though mostly I don't need to transcoded), on a little lenovo tiny workstation I picked up on the cheap. Storage is on my NAS.

[–] Green@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We have a Nvidia Shield so transcoding isn't needed for us either. Our server is on an old NUC with a fifth generation i3. Started overheating a year ago so I removed it from its case. It's running Windows though so now that the little one is back in school I might upgrade it to Mint and see if I can prolong its life.

Regarding YouTube, we have Smartube on the Shield, and have it configured to open to the playlists page, with our son having his own profile. This lets us set up playlists for him to watch that don't include any attention whoring videos and are (at least in part) vetted by us beforehand. Lately I've been considering adding the YouTube content to our server. Smartube is pretty tweakable though, I like it.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

With no server-side transcoding, yeah the nuc is plenty, but I also run my media server (JF containers, to be specific) on Debian.

If you do end up needing transcoding, the newer Intel stuff is great. I'm considering arc actually for other reasons, but ideally anything skylake (for HEVC) or Kaby Lake (hevc 10 bit) on up is a rock solid choice, no external GPU needed.

[–] Green@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I appreciate the advice, I'll keep that in mind should I want server transcoding in the future.

[–] iterable@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All time with tech as a child should be limited and parents need to watch what they are doing. Just like the tv generation it is easy to let it babysit but it comes with a cost.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Three hours for teens? Does that include doing homework and such? At that age I was tinkering with C++, does that going as screentime?

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The screen isn't the problem. The content is.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 5 points 2 months ago

Not the first time in my life I've changed position based on evidence. Not the last.

The only reason to ask questions is to listen to answers, rhetorics be damned.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is a TV in the background playing Baby Einstein considered screen time? My daughter is 17 MO and she gets interested on the songs but then goes back to playing. Is she ruined? 😭

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

It’s over, her first words will be, “we need to stop the Rizzler from flushing charged lemonade down the skibidi toilet” and you will be the sole blame.

[–] UnpledgedCatnapTipper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If I was limited to 3 hours of screen time as a teenager I probably wouldn't be alive today. I used video games as a coping mechanism to dissociate from my gender dysphoria and (at the time) unsupportive family that I was hiding in the closet from. It wasn't what I would call healthy but I didn't exactly have a lot of other options.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, as teenagers high amounts of screen time is a symptom of other stuff, whether it's an abusive home situation or mental health issues, or something else

In addition to... What else is there to do as a teenager these days? Especially in a car-centric place?

Kids however probably should have screen time limited, and try to be engaged in other ways, especially their parents, however, many parents are not good parents