science

14722 readers

775 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 months ago by UniversalMonk@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] iquanyin@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

let me guess: fruit bats.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You need not guess, it says in the article.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I cannot read on account of my high blood sugar

[–] scarilog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

See, if you were a bat, that wouldn't be an issue

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I would be upset if i could read your comment

[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

I had to go to the study to find it, but their levels were above 750 mg/dl. For comparison a human would be 80-100 typically.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Looking forward to further research in this area, would be nice to give a diabetic a few more options.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago