this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
195 points (98.0% liked)

Enshittification

1562 readers
2 users here now

What is enshittification?

The phenomenon of online platforms gradually degrading the quality of their services, often by promoting advertisements and sponsored content, in order to increase profits. (Cory Doctorow, 2022, extracted from Wikitionary) source

The lifecycle of Big Internet

We discuss how predatory big tech platforms live and die by luring people in and then decaying for profit.

Embrace, extend and extinguish

We also discuss how naturally open technologies like the Fediverse can be susceptible to corporate takeovers, rugpulls and subsequent enshittification.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 92 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Oh you got one of our machines for cheaper than we sell it? Well, now you have to pay $95 just to use it!"

Fuck these companies.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well they could have gone the Tesla route and said you can't resell it at all. Still a dick move but it could be worse.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tesla allows resale I thought, you just forfeit all your DLC, killing the resale value

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cybercuck is not allowed to be resold during the first year.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh wow, they sue you for $50k if you try. What confidence in their product.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

It's an empty threat. Many of them are being resold on the secondary market and the value is dropping.

[–] don@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

While I’ve seen some say that it’s a mechanism to stop scalpers from buying up the things and reselling at a huge margin, I’ve also seen what Tesla’s owner is capable of doing.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Speaking of owner's and their capabilities; Whistling Diesel is not my favorite guy, but he did a number on the Cybertruck.

[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not surprising. They lucked into insane pandemic demand, and kinda didn’t do anything with it. Now they are picking at the corpse of their brand.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

That’s excellent. I’m glad I bought a rowing machine with no electronics.

… it’s been six months. It’s still in the box.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 27 points 2 months ago

hhaha what better way to prevent customers than to kill your resale market. awesome

[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Ridiculous and the final straw for me. Will be rooting for and buying from a competitor now.

[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Just get a normal bike. If you really need to ride indoors, get a turbo trainer. At least you have a bike you can use in and outdoors.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

The official reason why is so that new members “receive the same high-quality onboarding experience Peloton is known for.”

Also the pride and accomplishment.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 months ago

We’re past the point where capitalism pretends to be good. This is the stage where it’s revealed to be a people-crushing juggernaut.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

The slimy ways in which manufacturers and suppliers force themselves within private transactions of goods have to be stopped.

I wouldn't be as upset if it produced a message: "Hey, we've noticed you've just got this used product! Would you like a tune-up, onboarding, warranty etc. for $X00?", but you can decline and still use it. The fact they disallow resale unless they get a cut is unethical and unreasonable.

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

where's the hackers jailbreaking it

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

DMCA violations are $500,000 and 5 years in prison for a first offense

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

The fact that it is ”illegal” to modify your own bought product, but not illegal to prevent usable equipment from being sold second hand with no strings attached, is such peak America.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 9 points 2 months ago

Doesn't also require a $50 subscription in order to actually use that screen and don't just use it as a generic ultracheap equipment?

What kind of idiot introduces a fee that discourages new users to become subscribers??

Isn't it better to get a new subscriber that pays every month? Old owner is bored and canceled the subscription already years ago

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Do you have to activate it to use it? Can you not use it offline?