this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
177 points (99.4% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3477 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The United Auto Workers union on Tuesday filed federal labor charges against former President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk for threatening to intimidate workers who go on strike.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For the head of the teamsters to go to the RNC event and try to get their support was so laughable. This is what union leaders should be doing

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. The teamsters president is playing political games. They only want the PRO act. It wasn't happening with only lukewarm democratic support, so by getting the Republican party to cheer about being "pro-labor" at the televised RNC, it pressures Democrats to chase the ball. Don't believe me? Well it worked. Democrats were demanding a vote on the PRO act the next week.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh. I didn’t like Fain speaking at the RNC, but if his goal was to help workers, then I finally get it! Sneaky bastard! Hee hee hee!

[–] aegis_sum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Fain is UAW, it was the teamsters at the RNC.

[–] FardyCakes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not saying it wasn’t disappointing to see him there, but there is also an argument that the Teamsters were there with a pro-labor message (that was not well received by the crowd) in order to push democrats toward voting on pro labor legislation called the PRO Act I believe, which they did the following week.

I can tell you that there are some very confused members of the Teamsters that will vote against their own interests because they’re brainwashed by right wing media. The leadership is not. They were sending a message to the Democratic Party that lawmakers need to hold up their end of the bargain. The PRO Act ended up on the floor the following week if I recall correctly.

Edit: The PRO Act is legislation meant to strengthen workers’ rights to organize.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 1 month ago

Good but nothing will be done, Feds are limp dick when it comes anything to do with worker's right.

God forbid they have to enforce laws on the books lol

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNN:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnn.com/2024/08/13/business/uaw-trump-musk-charges/index.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support