this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
355 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2543 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 87 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It really seems like election rigging should be a crime

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 61 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It is, but it doesn't apply in this case because bskdheiwhdh see vdvdhdkwjsjd.

-SCOTUS

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago

As a cohort, the American gerontocracy is uniquely shitty. You almost have to admire the boomers’ tenacity to destroy everything before they die.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Too bad we have a coward attorney-general.

[–] alchemist2023@lemmy.world 85 points 3 months ago (4 children)

i really hope the Dems have a plan to combat this nonsense

[–] quixotic120@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Watch it happen and complain after the fact based on historical precedent. Perhaps they will later appeal to the judicial system that will not care because trump spent his term fairly efficiently jamming it full of shit. Then instead of escalating the issue they will just let it go, because “decorum”

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Biden already made an admission that he knows these issues are going to occur.

Acknowledgement and action are different though. I assume that we're going to fuck around and find out because no one wants to get confrontational with the Republicans over it.

[–] Skydancer@pawb.social -1 points 3 months ago

Dems don't even need to come up with a plan - the Venezuelan opposition just showed them what to do.

Unfortunately, Venezuela also provided a roadmap to the Repubs. In the end, it may come down to exactly what you said: combat.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 71 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Election deniers is a bullshit term for people that are already preparing for the loss. Traitors is more fitting. Terrorists works too.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

The word you're looking for is "euphemism". The media always does this garbage to make the party of traitors seen like they have a point

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

Most notably, the law removed Raffensperger, who resisted Trump’s demands to “find 11,780 votes” to overturn Biden’s victory, as chair and voting member of the state board, which oversees voting rules and election certification. Instead, it gave Republicans in the heavily gerrymandered legislature more power to choose the board’s members, which allowed election deniers to gain a controlling majority of the body this year

Man, Georgia is going to be a cluster fuck this year!

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So, what's being done to prevent it?

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Well, Biden said publicly that he didn't expect a peaceful transfer of power if Trump loses. One would hope that means that contingency plans are being drawn up for every possible legal challenge or disruption, all the way up to putting down a violent coup attempt and apprehending conspirators at the highest levels of government. Given the insanity we've already seen, and the unmistakable warning signs that keep popping upl around us today, to do anything less would be pure negligence.

Unfortunately, plans like that aren't something that can really be talked about publicly. We just have to wait and see and hope that Biden isn't going to fiddle while Rome burns.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I hope Larrry David shows up to give people water!

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I would expect Georgia is one of the states where it's illegal to give water to people in line to vote.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are there others? Right after democrats picked up 2 senate seats in 2020 the republicans created a bunch of election laws, this being one of them.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't know how many states did that bullshit. I just know terrible right-wing ideas usually spread, so I assume if there's one there's probably more.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Yes, that is literally the plot of the last season of Curb.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mother Jones - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Mother Jones:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/08/georgia-election-board-reasonable-inquiry-rule-trump/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Why are people always downvoting this bot?