this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35727 readers
1026 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To my understanding, nowadays, the standard way to fix a broken bone is to attach all the pieces together with a metal plate and some screws.

But how did they come with that idea ? Did people thought that the first surgeon doing so was crazy when they went to the hardware store to buy a drill ? Or was it immediately accepted by the community ?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure "standard" is accurate, I couldn't find any statistics on methodology for reducing and fixing fractures in long bones. But that's tangential, I just bring it up for general discussion if someone else finds data on that and would be so kind as to let me know since I'm curious.

But, fixation of bones via surgery goes back a few hundred years as an idea. Afaik, nobody knows who came up with the idea, but it was never viable until the late 1800s when surgeons started seriously working on it after Lister managed to figure out what caused infections.. The implements used weren't "off the rack", they were purpose made for the job in the hopes of preventing the known problems in implementation like the implants corroding or causing bad reactions.

From there, development of the implants was gradual, with changes to the acceptable design advancing as flaws were discovered and corrected.

The idea of internal fixation was pretty much accepted by the medical community from the beginning. I've never run across any formal opposition in the form of published opinion, but I'm also not a historian with access to the good libraries. My background in this stuff is hobbyist level interest with access to a decent medical library back in the nineties and oughts. That library wasn't for history, it was curated for doctors and focused on modern practice.

Anyway, the point of that was that by the time surgeons were doing procedures, the idea had already been long accepted, and Lister himself did some of the early work on internal fixation.

Now, some less search engine friendly stuff. There are examples of attempts at repairing bones via surgery going back to the bronze age. They were pretty badly done, iirc, and likely caused problems beyond that of normal surgical complications, but there are bones from archaeological digs that were wired or otherwise surgically altered with implants of some kind. Don't ask me for dates on that, I'm pulling the info from memory of articles I read over a decade ago, and I wasn't reading it for that kind of thing.

But, if you search up, use the term "internal fixation" and you'll get hits from medical journals, related publications, and likely some answers like this scattered among them. If you make it "history of internal fixation", I know there's several good histories of the subject online, I looked it up when my kid asked a similar set of questions when their grandmother had surgery a while back, to refresh what I had picked up back in the day.

Again, please remember that I'm pulling this from memory. Don't try and use it for homework or anything. It's accurate enough for this kind of use to give a general answer, but I can't recall any specific dates, and the only reason I remember Lister as being a huge factor is that he was a huge factor in everything medical. His name kinda sticks in your head when he's essentially the father of modern surgery as a whole.

[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Thanks a lot, that's a pretty extensive answer, and considering that tell that you do it from memory, it seems that you're a real human :). May-be I'll have a look at the internal fixation rabbithole, but it's just curiosity knowing someone who just got that kind of surgery than a homework/project.

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They probably thought "How do you repair a chair? With nuts, bolts and tools". I bet if TIG-welding bones was an option, those dudes would do that.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

Or even better: Mig weld. Although, instead of metal, I guess it would be even better to some how use Calcium, so as soon as someone invents a CIG weld, this should be explored.

[–] rollmagma@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

There's human fossils where it's clear they poured molten bronze or something into a mans skull to patch the broken bone. Using metals to mend bones has been a practice since ever basically.

[–] Atin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I thought setting the broken bones and putting the limb in a plaster cast until it healed was the standard.

I would assume that a surgeon at one point saw someone repairing wooden framing or such and thought that looked like a good idea.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago

The first surgeons worked on cadavers like Dr. Frankenstein. They were equally as reviled.