this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
189 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3790 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
189
‘Look Closely at His Ear’: Former Obama WH Photog Appears to Delete X Account After Implying Trump Wasn’t Shot (www.mediaite.com)
submitted 3 months ago by Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 93 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You know, given someone was shot dead at his rally, I'm not sure how much I care if he was shot in the ear or not. I know there might be some mouth breathers who think he's cooler for getting grazed in the ear but like... It was still an assassination attempt regardless, right? Or is the conspiracy that someone really hated that ex-firefighter?

Point is, miss by an inch or miss by a mile, a shot was shot. I hate the guy but debating the state of this assholes ear seems like a waste when we could be talking about Harris, lol

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 43 points 3 months ago

Or is the conspiracy that someone really hated that ex-firefighter?

there is no conspiracy, people are laughing at him for being fucking pussy trying to harvest some sympathy.

person who said "he loves soldiers who did not get captured" now wears menstrual pad on his head for effect when it is clearly not necessary.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean sure. I agree with everything you said.

It doesn't matter if he was hit or not and someone is dead (actually 2 people). However--and I'm not saying I buy into this--if I had to pick a person / campaign who would set up live fire into a crowd and who cares who gets hit if the "target" gets a good photo op, it is trump all day long. And the kicker of THAT is I could imagine someone doing a bane / dark Knight rises "someone has to be in the wreckage" volunteer to get swiss cheesed by secret service.

I don't think the shooter kid meets that profile, but this is within the realm of possible for a fucker like trump.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And the kicker of THAT is I could imagine someone doing a bane / dark Knight rises “someone has to be in the wreckage” volunteer to get swiss cheesed by secret service.

It's also within the realm of possible that, if there were a conspiracy, they could've simply lied to the shooter and told him that he wouldn't be treated like a disposable loose end.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Also very true.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

Just because audience got shot doesn’t mean every bullet was a real round.

Again, we don’t know until proven so take this with lots of salt but, it’s not too hard to make the first 3 shots a blank, trump hides after the first few shots, and the shooter keeps shooting the non blank shots.

I think his team is too incompetent to pull this off, but it’s definitely possible.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Well, I do have to say it is interesting. I'm no expert on gun shot wounds of any kind, but I'm not sure how much visible damage should remain at this point. His doctor, Ronny Jackson said that the bullet track “produced a 2 cm wide wound that extended down to the cartilaginous surface of the ear."

This image is from this article and is dated Aug-24, 2023, obviously before he was injured.

This is from the post mentioned in the article dated July-27, 2024, nearly 2 weeks after the injury.

I can't see any marks from a bullet wound. Am I blind? It has only been 1.5 to 2 weeks since the injury. Shouldn't there still be some visible scarring if it was an actual hit and left a 2 cm (that's about 3/4" for my fellow Americans) wide track down to the cartilage?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but that's not been seen in pictures. In order to do cartilage damage, it would have had to tear the upper ear lobe. What we have in pictures is blood (ears bleed like crazy due to thin membane and high blood pressure) after the shooting, and then Trump without bandages playing golf.

I'm not pushing any conspiracy theories here, but if I may just say, that the whole bandage thing at the convention was absolutely bullshit. It's clear he dodged a bullet, literally, because a person in the crowd was killed. What I'm saying is that Ronny Jackson's take, and Trump's photos and behavior after the fact don't match up.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. As usual, Jackson is lying through his teeth. It was a slight graze. He didn't get part of his ear blown off.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If his ear got hit with a bullet. It absolutely would have destroyed part of his ear. Literally anyone that owns a gun would know that. It was for sure a piece of glass.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 months ago

I was deployed twice, got to see people with grazing wounds. They still needed a lot of stitches due to the kinetic energy of the bullet flying by them.

I don’t by for one second Trump was grazed.

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

I'm glad you're pushing back. That person didn't address any of the valid points you've raised and I can't stand when people respond and do that.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm 30 and don't heal from a blister in 2 weeks.

This dude is 80 and had a piece of his ear ripped off, totally healed 2 weeks later, no deformity.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Yah I slightly burned my hand like two weeks ago and there is still a red mark there.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

His doctor

If that's that the same doctor that keeps trying to claim Trump isn't obese, then in not believing a word he says

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 47 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The best evidence we have that Trump didn’t get grazed by the bullet is from Trump himself when he got mad fbi director said the investigation is ongoing and that we don’t know if it was a bullet or shrapnel that hit Trump.

He didn’t get hit by a bullet, he was cut by shrapnel or something.

[–] naun@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I read that it was glass from the podium.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

The funny thing is that it doesn’t really matter that much.

The secret service messed up by allowing this to happen.

Republifuckers getting upset about whether it was a bullet or shrapnel (which it clearly was) it is hilarious.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

Those Trumpists shitheads love conspiracy theories about pedophile (an antisemitic dog whistle) lizard people (an antisemitic dog whistle) trafficking in children in the non-existent basement dungeons of pizza parlours but when anyone questions whether their orange God king might have been hit by flying glass they lose their fucking minds.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 33 points 3 months ago

I’m assuming the orange paint covers the scar.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

I don’t want to dive into conspiracy theory but realistically, im gonna have doubt until i see a clear wound of some kind… like why wouldn’t there be one right?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

They're going to come out and say Trump is a mutant! This is some sort of guerrilla marketing for Deadpool and Wolverine isn't it? Damn you, Ryan Reynolds!

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The more I hear about this, the funnier these pictures become. They're really hauling him out like he was shot in the chest. The one they keep saying is going to make America great again apparently wouldn't survive an ear piercing at Claire's. Teddy wouldn't have even flinched.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

"missed me"

[–] Shapillon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

tbf they had to haul him in case the shooter took another shot or if there were multiple ones.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

That's true, but I can't laugh at that 😤