this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

3516 readers
443 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So they're ruining the original artistic vision, dumbing down literature despite existing whithin the greatest age of information, all while possibly ruining the original message and meanings of the book. Tech bros need to walk outside, touch grass, feel the warmth of the sun on their skin, and maybe try talking to an actual human for once in their life.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm proud of my demon spawn

She's a tech savvy electrical engineer who spends her working hours mucking about with semiconductors.

When she's not at work, which seems to be pretty much all day every day, she's out on remote hiking trails with primitive camping gear.

From this old man's perspective, she's living the ideal balanced life.

[–] Doombot1@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Computer engineer here. I’m similar, spend a lot of my time mucking w/ semiconductors & such at work - I wouldn’t quite say CompEs and EEs are “tech bros” though. Tech savvy? Sure! But tech bros I like to think are the people who are more interested in monetizing tech than actually knowing how to use it.

That said, I most certainly consider myself a demon spawn.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the literary equivalent of:

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was the sanitisation of Roald Dahl's books, which already happened and was likely celebrated on Lemmy.

[–] MiltownClowns@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

likely

You're just straw manning without the commitment.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I'm gardening, what are you talking about.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But that's not the great Gatsby that's the ok Gatsby

[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Reduce teen literacy levels with this one easy step!!! Teachers hate it!!!

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I love that they picked a book that is 90% nuance and symbolism for a tool that destroys nuance and symbolism...it's like claymation Shakespeare celebrity death match.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow it’s like they’re actively trying to make people dumber and not even hiding it anymore

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is learning a new language being dumber? This is awesome.

[–] shikitohno@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Something like this to produce graded readers is a great idea, but I don't see anything in the ad itself that indicates it's for language learners. If this is for a general audience for native speakers, then it's enabling people to avoid learning to read (and ultimately use) more complex and nuanced language, in favor of infantilizing consumers and spoon feeding them everything.

The only use case I could see this being a positive for when aimed at native speakers would be something like adult literacy programs, or maybe homeschooling for kids with difficulties learning to read who don't have the trained, professional support that one would hope they might have in a more typical school setting. For adults who struggle with illiteracy, I could see this being quite beneficial, though. It's something that people will often be embarrassed about to begin with, and somebody who's feeling self-conscious about this could be demotivated by only being able to read books aimed at children. Even if they say "Screw it, I need to do this," it can be difficult to maintain motivation and interest when the only content you can find at your reading level is written for little kids. If they could have adult materials adapted to a level that's challenging but manageable for them, I could certainly see that being a good thing.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

language evolving doesn't make people dumber

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It does if that “evolution” consists of removing large or complex words simply because they’re “too hard”