this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
44 points (64.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3025 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Ultimately, the decision rests with Biden on whether he stays in, and the president has been insistent this week that he’s not going anywhere. But these sources say that Biden is done — whether he drops out before November or loses to Trump on Election Day.

It's not Biden's decision.

The DNC is a private organization with a nonbinding primary.

They could put Steamboat Willy on the ballot if they wanted to

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

His cabinet could also use the 25th ammendment and it pretty much kills his candidacy as well.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Apparently he hasn't had a full cabinet meeting since October 2023. Wouldn't surprise me if his chief of staff is shielding him from the cabinet specifically over fears of them realizing just how compromised Biden is mentally.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You mean Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, former management consultant for Bain Capital?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I didn’t need to know that. The rot goes deep.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Jesus. That’s even more insidious. More selfish. “We can’t let the people with the power to do something know they should probably do something.”

Great plan. Because they’re just opening up the country to bear the burden instead of his cabinet—whose fucking job it is to take care of this shit.

Jesus Christ that pisses me off

I’ve been saying that we know it’s a huge gamble to have another candidate at this point. But that gamble is worth it if they’re seeing that running him is a guaranteed loss. What the fuck

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

If that’s not hyperbole, maybe take a break from this clusterfuck and have some fun. It’s not gonna get better anytime soon. Have a great weekend.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Yep. There's lots of options.

It's just the people who can do it, are ones Biden put in power, so they don't want to.

Just like how we found out lots of shit needed changed after trump was president, there's lots of shit we need to change after Biden too.

We can't just keep pretending another president will always do the right thing. We need an exit strategy for presidents like we've had the last two terms that routinely out themselves over the country

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But practically, he could split the party.

Trump basically made the same threat back when he was an "undesired" candidate. They couldn't get rid of him, because he'd just trash the party.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But practically, he could split the party

Bruh who the fuck would vote for Joe Biden if he wasn't the Dem nominee?

trump? Yeah, that threat has teeth, republicans are stuck with him

But Biden? He doesn't really have supporters, he has people who want to stop trump.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Not to mention, it’d be supremely out of character for him, not to mention the people around him, for that to ever happen.

Trump? Yeah, he’d do that in a heartbeat. But if Biden were forced out, I don’t see anything like that happening. I’m no great fan of the guy, but he’s not that detached from reality.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Biden/RFK 2024. That’s a scary thought.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (64 children)

If he does decide not to run again what are you going to post about going forward?

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Probably about how the Dems replaced Biden with the wrong candidate or something like that.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I mean it will almost certainly be Harris and then the news media would walk as close to the sexist line as they can with criticisms.

Look at what’s already been said by her by normally left leaning outlets, they tear her down all the time

[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I know I've blocked Ozma before. I'm certain of it This should prevent me seeing their posts, right? Is blocking users something a server admin can disable?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 2 points 4 months ago

The heck? Ozma is a treasure.

load more comments (62 replies)
[–] JoeTheSane@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Dear Biden Campaign,

Joe has done good work and it's time to rest and enjoy his remaining time with his family. He can't win it. Please fake a medical emergency so he can drop out with some dignity and let Harris run with it.

Signed, Don't Want My Trans Kids Jailed Or Killed

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

And this article was written before he called Zelensky Putin and Harris Trump on the same day.

Jesus I am so fucking sick of having to walk on eggshells around the president’s ego. Trump was far worse, to be sure, but this is still very bad.

load more comments
view more: next ›