this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
27 points (96.6% liked)

Formula 1

9080 readers
63 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
🇺🇸 United States 21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sergio should be a little worried by the use of that word.

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just a bit, yeah. I'm sure Helmut is halfway to wanting to kill someone over Checo's form lately.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that by not scoring points he's putting the WCC is jeopardy. Both McLaren drivers are scoring points. The only logical thing RB can do is flip DannyRick and Perez. But, there is no telling if Danny can perform any better.

[–] eksb@programming.dev 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Flipping Checo and Yuki is just as logical, is it not?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm assuming that all the data favors Danny. Don't forget, Red Bull has a whole lot of data to determine who is quicker.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Somehow hard to see how the guy who is "faster" according to the data is consistently slower in the real world

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Whatever that means. All I'm saying is that RB has empirical evidence of who is better.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago

You also have to acknowledge that far more than sporting concerns are involved in their decision making or else Yuki would have been already in that seat

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Tsunoda exists, as does Lawson. I think you're discounting them.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Changing drivers mid-season would tend to favor experience.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Tsunoda is experienced and has proven to be consistent at RB. Ricciardo is only the first of those two.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why though. Both the experienced drivers are performing bad. The car will be a new experience in either case

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

One has driven for the team before, knowing the engineers. Both parties should know what to expect.

But you mistake me. I don't care who replaces Perez or if anyone does.

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Is this what sainz is waiting for? I know their dad's have bad blood, but what other good options are there? (Unless they give Alonso a multi year contract...)

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

People keep saying about how their dads hate eachother, but Jos and Horner also hate eachother, so I honestly don't see Christian giving a shit, especially if it means he gets a solid second driver.

Just remains to be seen whether RB wants Sainz or whether they want someone who definitely won't even attempt to battle Max, imo

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe, though I understood the reason RB renewed Perez in the first place was because they were afraid Carlos and Max competing each other would lead to a Gasly-Ocon situation, so he may be waiting for a seat that will never be offered to him.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

No disrespect to sainz but he is no equal to max while gasly and ocon are perhaps the most equally matched line up in the grid. While there is a real risk of Carlos and Max competing with each other to the detriment of the team, that is because Carlos is close enough to max. Gasly and ocon on the other hand are so equally matched that they end up sharing the same real estate on track in almost every race

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Silverstone was not entirely his fault, but when you are never performing you can't absorb the effects of the unexpected. Tough situation for him.

[–] Bademantel@feddit.de 7 points 4 months ago

I mean getting stuck in the gravel during qualifying was his fault. I understand the conditions were traitorous but Max proved that it was entirely possible to not do a 180 but pass through the gravel pit.

With such a bad result the team needed to gamble to get a meaningful result.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 5 points 4 months ago

I mean, sure, he might have been screwed by the strategy but it was an easy call for the team to gamble at that point because he was still stuck at what, 16th? It's not like he was making up positions and soaring up the field. His pace was just weak all weekend (again). Just look at his attempt to deny Sainz fastest lap and reclaim it for Red Bull at the end. He was just slow.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

The rumor I’ve heard, which may or may not be hearsay, is that Checo needs to be within 100 points and 5 places off Max in the WDC by Spa to keep the seat. If that’s the case it’s almost impossible for him to get there after an abysmal weekend at silverstone.