this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
59 points (71.2% liked)

Gaming

2525 readers
216 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I reported them for harassment with the following statement:

The purpose of this group is to review bomb any game that has gay representation. Their discussion threads talk about using other platforms to discriminate against LGBTQ+ communities and individuals to circumvent Steam's TOS policies. This type of behavior promotes discrimination, review brigading, and toxicity. It is surprising Steam is tolerating such open homophobia on this platform.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how many of the people following it are taking them as recommendations instead of warnings

[–] shani66@ani.social 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I am curious about these titles now lol

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

Personally, steam reviews don't make me want, or not want to play games. That being said, if I saw these reviews on a game that I had any interest in acquiring, I would consider it a selling point.

Normally I judge stuff for myself. I'll watch reviews, and gameplay footage, etc before making any kind of purchasing decision. Steam reviews are usually checked, but they don't weigh into the decision strongly enough for me to care.

With all that being said, intentionally bombing a games score en masse with either bot/alt/spam accounts just because you personally don't like them, is seriously uncool.

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago

Well it's no longer pride month, so why give a fuck about your customers and fans?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

"Very heterosexual person" plays every gay game they can find, looking for every gay experience they can do in the game

[–] shani66@ani.social 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So i gotta ask what that first game's full title is

[–] Grimm@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago

//TODO: today. Free to play game that’s about 4 hours long. Very chill vibes. I’d recommend it.

[–] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Between quite a few developers being queer and queer inclusion in the actual games it won’t be long before these reviewers can’t even play Candy Crush.

Self-exclusion FTW

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Until Then is on my wishlist, nice

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 4 points 4 months ago

That far right one is almost self awarewolves level

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Steam allows games that let people role play being a pervert on a Japanese train. I'm not sure they'll take action on this.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech -2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

548 Followers

If they didn't we'd be on here saying they should be allowing free speech. There's a balance. Better thing to do instead of trying to blame Valve is to call out the curator themselves so we can call them out on their shite beliefs

[–] TheShadow277@slrpnk.net 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

call out the curator themselves so we can call them out on their shite beliefs

Libs have been saying that for decades and look at the rise of bigoted beliefs all over the world right now. Seems that's not the way to go; if you tolerate intolerance then intolerance will win every time.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 11 points 4 months ago

Eh true, that's fair.

[–] Grimm@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 months ago

They would just block me for being overtly gay.

No, Valve and GabeN can go fuck themselves if they're willing to tolerate this.