this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22049 readers
28 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They just want to make money. They've covered the country with cameras and then they dropped the speed limit to a brisk walk. Breaking 20mph is almost guaranteed by accident, and those cameras are going to snitch.

Good job guys.

[–] ntzm@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

20mph is significantly safer than 30mph, that's all there is to it

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While it sounds good on paper, in practice, they've screwed it up. They're putting the new speed limits in place on every 30mph road in Wales before they've put the public transport alternatives in place.

There's currently no reason for someone to switch to public transport, especially if the buses are going to be stuck at the same speed as the cars, but stopping regularly too. Our roads are too narrow to install bus lanes, and barely have enough room for single file traffic through lots of the towns and villages. The trains are being upgraded, but that's not scheduled to finish until at least next year, and at the moment they're slow and very unreliable. It feels like every week the trains are cancelled and an inadequate replacement bus service is put on.

I'm disabled, and have to travel from my town, Aberdare, to the main hospital in Cardiff, UHW, on a regular basis. If I had to leave now, it would take 42 minutes by car, or 2 hours and 6 minutes by public transport. The shortest journey is tomorrow morning and would take 1 hour and 31 minutes, more than double the time of the car journey. The closest inpatient hospital is 22 minutes by car, or over an hour by public transport. The difference the new speed limits are going to make is negligible compared to how slow public transport is here.

All this is going to do is annoy and upset people, and turn them off the idea of using public transport, and push a lot of people towards voting for the parties who were against this. Out of the main parties, that mainly seems to be the Conservatives, so that's going to be bad for all of us.

[–] corristo@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not from Wales, so I don't know how good the cycling infrastructure is there. But for me this change would make me feel much safer cycling on busy city streets. So this might encourage a few people to take their bike instead of their car.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The person you replied to is disabled - or so he claims, even if we assume he is lying about that, there are other people in his town who actually are disabled (I don't even have to look, disability is common enough around the world). While bikes are great for "normal people", they are not an answer for the disabled who may not be able to ride them at all. As such while cities should encourage more biking, they should not make bikes the backbone of how people are expected to get around.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

or so he claims, even if we assume he is lying about that

...what reason would we have to assume this, and why even bring it up if there isn't reason to?

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Because on the internet people lye about things all the time.

[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Hotchpotch@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think that's stupid?

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll bite. Arbitrarily lowering speed limits while still leaving the road the same means many people will drive the old speed (as that is what will "feel" right). Great if you're trying to rack up photo radar ticket income, not so great if your motives are better safety and fewer cars on the road.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're not just lowering the speed limit. From the FAQ:

Will the roll out involve money being spent on speed bumps?

There is no plan to include traffic calming (including speed bumps) as part of the change to speed limits. There are other ‘softer’ measures that might be introduced, such as using buffer speed limits, removing the centre line, narrowing the carriageway visually, using planting etc.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

might be introduced

So no, currently they're not doing anything else.