this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37617 readers
185 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nromdotcom@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The title of this post is at best misleading and at worst simply wrong. From the source that OP linked in a couple other comments here (emphasis mine throughout):

Since the start of July, the app's downloads have fallen by almost 30% compared to the preceding two months, according to data from app performance tracker Apptopia. ... Twitter has gained usually 15 million to 30 million users a month since 2011, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It gained just 10 million users between August and September of this year. ... Visits to the web version of X, which still operates as twitter.com, fell since the start of the year, with global web traffic down 10% in August and US traffic down 15%, compared to a year ago, according to an analysis by Similarweb. ... So far in September, daily users are down to 249 million, a roughly 2% decrease... Monthly users are down by about the same percentage, now at 393 million users from 398 million in July.

That is emphatically not "loses over 30% of users in two months." That is, though, "signs of slowing growth" and "signs of the most recent round of dramatic announcements wearing off and folks moving on with their lives" which is why Musk is doing his best to get back into the news cycle.

Maybe OP should go ahead and update the post with a more accurate title to avoid spreading misinformation.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The title comes from the linked article.

[–] fer0n@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It can still be edited, it’s just being pre-filled if you post via the website

[–] nromdotcom@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Okay. If the article is misleading or wrong, it shouldn't be posted. If it is found to be incorrect after posting, is it better to fix the title and let the comments sort it out or to fully delete the post?

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I couldn’t even read past the first 2 sentences of this article it’s such generic clickbait nonsense.

[–] luke@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

These articles are made for the sole purpose of posting to social media so people read the title and think "Yeah! 😠"

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't even open the article but I agree!

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

According to a report published by popular research companies, the company faced a significant financial loss by closing the last two months with a user loss of over thirty percent.

This article doesn't show the source.

[–] 111@zerobytes.monster 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since the start of July, the app's downloads have fallen by almost 30% compared to the preceding two months, according to data from app performance tracker Apptopia.

Okay, this is different from losing 30% of users.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Not just different, it's exactly the opposite, they are still gaining users, just at a slower pace

[–] toothpicks@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

So, reading the rest of the comments, why are posting misleading articles without context then?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if the article's title were literally true, 70% of . . . what, hundreds of millions of users? A billion plus? Regardless, that isn't rock bottom, that's "balanced awkwardly on the edge of the roof of that ridiculously tall building in Dubai after parachuting out of an aircraft". There's still a lot of "down" to cover.