this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
39 points (86.8% liked)

New York Times gift articles

552 readers
40 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
39
The Chilling Reason You May Never See the New Trump Movie (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 4 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 60 points 4 months ago (2 children)

“If you do not immediately cease all publication and marketing of the movie, President Trump will pursue every appropriate legal means to hold you accountable for this gross violation of President Trump and the American people’s rights,” Trump’s lawyer wrote.

Trump doesn't want people to see it. That's probably a good reason to see it.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

Which is ridiculous because if you're watching it you either know how bad Trump is or you willfully don't care / think it's propaganda. It's amazing that he seems to think this will hurt his brand worse than anything he's done himself.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Trump is planning on using any and all political power he can get to go after his perceived enemies... That's his campaign platform.

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Where’d he learn that?

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

The Goebbels Academy for Political Science and Gender Studies

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

From his friend Vlad. Great guy. Amazing, truly. So very smart. He knows how to run a country so well. Not like that fraud who STOLE THE 2020 ELECTION.

[–] Benign@fedia.io 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Streisand effect anyone?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

This is the first I've heard of it, so yes.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Someone should remind Trump's Lawyers that he is "former president." It's fucked to continue using the title when he is not currently the president.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is common and correct to always refer to former Presidents as President, they generally only say former if it clears up ambiguity.

[–] Aviandelight@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is a courtesy that we give all past presidents, though it does being a smile to my face every time the fat orange ass is called "Mr."

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Professional courtesy should only be extended to professionals.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

The same argument applies to the word "courtesy" in there sentence

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Y'all motherfuckers made Citizens United a thing, over that anti-Hillary movie. Sit on your own petard.

[–] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Oh you mean the Benghazi one that was widely released in theaters that conveniently left out the part where the embassy guards said everything was fine and they didn’t need any reinforcements?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is it because I have zero interest in seeing anything about that turd bag?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah, we get bombarded with his face enough as it is. Maybe I'll watch it after I haven't heard from him for a couple of years, but at this point I don't think even him croaking would lessen the mania.

[–] dhcmrlchtdj__@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Disinterest is not that chilling a reason

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Lolbruh. This is going to be widely distributed by pirates. I’m looking forward to seeing it.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Can we just vpn Netflix Canada?