this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
792 points (99.7% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2607 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world 199 points 5 months ago (18 children)

Can we finally agree capitalism doesn’t give a fuck about anything but profits and therefore CANNOT self regulate?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Jon Stewart had an excellent monologue about the myth of corporate morality yesterday.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWVbZ0WQ3s8

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I love how they gave Jon Stewart his show back and he's been using it to burn every single thing he can, including them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Capitalism does not return the shopping cart.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Name a more iconic pair than bananas and fascist death squads

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

capitalists and pinkertons... oh wait

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Financiers and nutmeg? Wait that’s the same too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Trump and a rolled-up magazine?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 82 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The fine? $38 million.

Chiquita Brands International's profits in 2023? $3.1 billion.

That's a slap on the wrist if anything. Just the cost of doing business I guess.

[–] dornad@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

To put that into context:

if all you had was a $100 USD Note, the equivalent of that “slap on the wrist” fine would be $1.23

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'll do the math when I get home, but that serms high. Gut instinct I thought it would be more like $0.10.

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

(38 mill/3.1bil)*100=1.2258 roughly

[–] grue@lemmy.world 61 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] Zron@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

Implying they ever stopped.

You can’t think all of those private military contractors get all of their money from Uncle Sam.

Corporations have been using mercenaries for hundreds of years, they’ve just refined their PR departments lately.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We live in a sad world when this kind of thing keeps happening.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Again?

At this point it's not a surprise, it's when asked to name paramilitary financers, first name that comes up is chiquita.

PEOPLE DIED

PEOPLE NEED TO BE JAILED OVER THIS

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Damn that's crazy. I've never heard of bananas being associated with violence... anytime in the last 120-140 years...

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's where the term "banana republic" comes from.

[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Okay I'll come clean; I literally chose the range "120-140 years" by looking up the year that term was coined (1904) 😂

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And then we made it cute by putting it on clothing. What a twist.

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

It’s actually a super cute brand name if you just disregard everything about it

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

That's bananas

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

What year is this?!?

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Guess they don’t have friends in the CIA or state department like they used to.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Isn't Chiquita the corporate heir to United Fruit?

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago
[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is this an article from 70 years ago?

[–] dornad@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For Colombians who suffered at the hand of the guerrilla-paramilitary conflict, it was not 70 years ago.

The paramilitary group mentioned in the article, AUC, disbanded around 2006-2008.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Thank you for pointing that out.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As someone who hates both bananas and corporations financing death squads, I consider this a win.

[–] SecretSauces@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (4 children)

You leave the bananas out of this! They're a victim!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago

Again?!

Who's going to post that 2 nickels meme?

[–] FilthyHands@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

War is a racket.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 months ago

Eh same old same old... Wait they're getting "punished" this time? Well that's new I guess.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago

Over bananas boys. Bananas.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A Florida jury on Monday found banana company Chiquita Brands International liable for financing the Colombian paramilitary group Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC).

The jury in the civil case, in federal court in the Southern District of Florida, found that “Chiquita knowingly provided substantial assistance to the AUC to a degree sufficient to create a foreseeable risk of harm to others.”

Chiquita, one of the world’s largest banana producers, has been ordered to pay a total of $38.3 million to the families of eight victims of the AUC, which was a far-right paramilitary group that was designated a terrorist organization by the US.

In 2007, Chiquita pleaded guilty to making over 100 payments to the AUC totaling over $1.7 million despite the group being designated a terrorist organization.

An unnamed company executive had told the Justice Department that the payments had been made under the threat of violence, according to the release.

In a social media post, Colombia’s president, Gustavo Petro, reacted to the American jury’s Tuesday decision and asked why the same ruling was not made in his home country.


The original article contains 414 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Guess Dole got soul

load more comments
view more: next ›