Inpeach Hunter Biden! I don't know any one who voted for him.
Ad paid for by stupid people who believe Joe Biden's son is part of the government.
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
163 points (94.5% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3743 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Interestingly silent on trumps kids who were appointed White House positions and made hundreds of millions of dollars in those positions…
wHAT ABOut HeR EMalEs?
Czechmate
Just get off the bird site, use Mastodon or even better don’t microblog at all.
we take any money please - X
might as well, the tweets are just as bad now
X, the platform formerly known as Twitter,
just fucking call it twitter
Guessing you weren't around for "the artist formerly known as Prince", this is an ancient reference that the media is getting a kick out of bringing back to life.
Ex-Twitter sounds better and also let’s you know how much has changed.
Wtf is X?
yea
You know anyone that takes that job will be working under sweatshop kind of conditions. Having to go through a ridiculous amount of the most vial crap with only seconds to make a decision.
X can fuck right off.
And I will continue not to use Xitter in any way.
It's nice to be kingmaker
Russia, China and Iran are itching to pay a lot to destabilize the US AGAIN since it worked so well in 2016. Musk is itching to collect that money. Looks like a win, win.
Political debate from the right: "But when will the weaponized DOJ go after the crackhead son of the Biden Crime Family??"
"What can we do to attempt to remain relevant?"
This is the best summary I could come up with:
“We’re currently expanding our safety and elections teams to focus on combating manipulation, surfacing inauthentic accounts and closely monitoring the platform for emerging threats,” the company said in a blog post Tuesday, in which it also laid out its approach to political discourse and preventing voter manipulation as campaign season ramps up.
Shortly after his takeover, Musk laid off huge swaths of the company’s staff, including many employees responsible for safety, platform manipulation and election policy.
“We’re updating this policy to make sure we strike the right balance between tackling the most harmful types of content—those that could intimidate or deceive people into surrendering their right to participate in a civic process—and not censoring political debate,” X said.
The platform will add public labels to posts that violate the civic integrity policy and let users know when reach has been restricted on such content.
The company began taking steps in that direction in January, when it relaxed a ban on issue advertising and promised that further changes to political ads would be coming.
Twitter initially implemented restrictions on political and issue advertising in 2019 amid concerns that politicians could seek to target users with false or misleading information.
The original article contains 532 words, the summary contains 198 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Egolon's thumb shall be on the scale. All the fools still Xcreting are enabling this.