this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
618 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3797 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 234 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If you didn't think Twitter sucked before, wait until half the ads are for Trump.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It actually amazes me that people still use that cesspool.

[–] takeda@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, also anyone who claims that they didn't switch to mastodon because it is too confusing, must have serious learning disability. I can understand that Lemmy is harder than traditional reddit, because the problem is more complex and the service still need a lot of polish, but mastodon is very simple to use.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup. People have a mental block against it. They decided Mastodon was complicated, so even when confronted with its simplicity, they’re unwilling to deal with the first few minutes of uncomfortable novelty. I’ve talked to a few super-smart people who have this particular mental block and they still talk shit about Mastodon without genuinely trying it out first, while still railing against Twitter. People are irrationally stubborn.

[–] Darorad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, people got distracted by trying to figure out how it worked instead of just using it like they would any other service. I think people shouldn't have pushed the federated angle as hard. It's great, but most people don't care about it as much as other stuff. It probably would have had a bit better user retention if it was explained with it.

That being said, mastodon is significantly more complicated than the average service people use. To someone not super tech savvy, it makes sense that it could be enough to push them away. Anyone can get used to it fairly quickly, but any fiction pushes a ton of people away.

As an example, I work for a company that does web stuff, We changed dropdowns with few options to a multi-select menu component and saw like a 20% increase in the number of people completing the form.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] relative_iterator@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My sports news people are all still there. Wish they would join Mastodon but no luck yet 😩

[–] _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Who cares? Do they not have a website, or a YouTube show or something? There's still plenty of entertainers I like on there. Didn't stop me from deleting that Nazi cesspool and just getting that info elsewhere. You just have to want to actually quit and quit coming up with excuses. Sports ball is on other platforms, too.

[–] Ado@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How do yall feel this entitled over another persons decision to use any particular social media 😂super weird behavior

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Did you try messaging them?

[–] MajesticSloth@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think part of the problem is so many things have relied on it up until now. I read how at a college shooting that was the main way they had to tell people to stay where they were. Which is a problem if that is your only way to communicate in an emergency situation.

So much news is passed quickly from it or other social media. If you're not on it now you're often left in the dark. Which is good for mental well being for some of us (me), but bad at other times.

[–] Tetra@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

"Half" is being very optimistic.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

half? being generous are we?

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More like 80% then 15% for other republicans and 4% for libertarians and independents, almost no coverage will be given to democrats. Just enough to say they aren’t completely shutting them out which would be a lawsuit

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

All the ads for Democrats will be RFK Jr.

[–] JoshuaSlowpoke777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I might have to delete Twitter just to get away from political ads.

I subscribed to YouTube premium specifically to avoid political adverts while still supporting content creators (political adverts are even more repetitive and uncreative than commercials, in my mind), and I actively avoid any room my parents are in when they’re watching any TV at all during campaign season.

I’ll get my info on how to vote by actually looking up the candidates’ actions on databases, thanks.

People are starting to experience a real change right now. Those that are paying attention are trying to avoid Meta, X, formerly known as Twitter, Instagram, and a bunch of other partisan bs. The near-future will be interesting.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 103 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The real problem at this point isn't twitter. it's idiots continuing to use and empower Twitter even though they know it's a problem.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Same with reddit and other social media.

People need to start owning their behaviors but keyboard warrior talks much, but got forbid they face any slight inconvience.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Eh, at least with reddit you can stick to the niche subreddits there that don't have a large community anywhere else and avoid the political cesspool side of it. And if you use it on desktop in classic mode with ublock or other similar addons, it's still a pretty nice experience, all things considered.

Twitter, on the other hand, shoves anything and everything in your face against your will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This Musk guy is gonna be surprised face when the fascists come for him because he's a sexual deviant and a drug user.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’s rich though so all is forgiven, remember that wealth trumps all else

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Right up until the governing body remembers proscription exists

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That will never happen as long as he's rich and on their side.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Russia should get to shoot down Starlink satellites when they feel like it, yeah?

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what that means... Musk is also on their side, which appears to be the same as Republicans.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Starlink satellites have been used by the Ukrainian defenders.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, I realize that. At some point Musk cut Ukraine off from using them in certain regions or for certain purposes, but Starlink was donating services until they got a DoD contract recently. Overall it seems like a complicated situation, to say the least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Translates to- twitter will only show pro trump ads.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 year ago

Probably mostly, yes. Also this is likely an indication of how fucked their finances are.

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Why are people still using Twitter/x.

Puts on old man hat.

People talk shit about Twitter and still use it. Is it really that hard to quit? Essentially that makes everything you say seem unbelievable.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

A lot of people have abandoned it

[–] plant_based_monero@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Its not like everybody is hating on twitter, the ones that like it still use it but in lemmy you will see a lot of hate because, you know how we all came here in the first place

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

They desperately need money so yeah

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Muskrat needs to try to get some money flowing there somehow.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This was the plan all along. Let’s see if he can keep it afloat until November 2024. Watch for fresh cash infusions from familiar players.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Bruh 2023 is almost over, those ads are about to start flying any minute now and not stop until November 4th

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

He's gonna have so many rubles he can pretend he's Scrooge Mcduck.

[–] donuts@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People really need to just accept the fact that, for better or worse, "Twitter.com" as we knew it is dead and "X.com" is here to take all of the flaws and worst aspects of the old platform and turn them into the main selling points of the new platform. Extremist right-wing politics and disinformation are no longer bugs, but features.

It doesn't make sense to be so attached to a social network that you're willing to constantly turn a blind eye to how toxic it is for society and democracy.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Ditch Twitter

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Things went as predicably as we knew it would when Musk bought Twitter. He's always been an alt right sell out, and Twitter was a great way to broadcast alt right propaganda.

He's part of the still ongoing coup with the GOP plus his direct communication with Putin of all people. It's fairly obvious at this point.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

LMAO of course it does, Elon is using the site to specifically foment disinformation and support right wing politics.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Mush is probably desperate for every single cent he can wring out of Xitter. I'd guess that before they sold all the office furniture he went through every couch looking for loose change.

[–] mkhopper@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

And the collective IQ of this country just dropped another few thousand points.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Twitter is none stop political ads. They ever had a "no political ads" policy to begin with?

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I wonder what political party will be advertising alongside Nazi content? Hmmmm.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

The 2024 election is all that Twitter needs to survive through. After that Musk will probably let it die.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I definitely think he's trying to burn twatter down to the ground so he doesn't have to deal with it.

load more comments
view more: next ›