this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
45 points (94.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43907 readers
1098 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why do some cars have their engines in the front and some in the back, what are the advantages and disadvantages of the two builds. And why doesn't every car have full wheel drive?

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago (3 children)

$$$.

Front engine, rear drive is easy to build. Good driving characteristics until you lose traction in the rear, which isn’t hard because there’s not much weight back there. You get over steer which isn’t the easiest to deal with.

Front engine, front drive is cheap to build. Good driving characteristics until you start pushing the limits, then you get under steer which is easy to deal with by letting off the gas.

Rear engine, rear wheel drive. Same cost advantages of Front/front but has some quirky driving characteristics.

Rear engine, front drive: nope.

AWD: better driving characteristics, more cost and more weight.

Mid engine, rwd: similar to rear/rear, but costs more, better handling.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 30 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Rear engine, front drive: nope.

I need someone to go down the rabbit hole and tell me what attempts have been made to make this work.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I'm sure they all ended as fireballs.

Understeers into corner "Shit!"

Applies brakes and immediately oversteers "Fuck!"

Goes off ravine sideways "Oh, hell!"

Plummets to ground facing the sky "Shiiiiii-"

Engine block pierces through fuel tank on impact and gets exploded through the cabin

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Anything can turn into fireball if you try hard enough.

Well that sure sounds exiting...

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would be willing to bet Buckminster Fuller probably tried it.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Correct. The Dymaxion car had it.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

That piece of art reminds me of Messerschmitt forrays into "car" building: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_KR200

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why does it look like a catfish?

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

why don't all our cars look like catfish?

[–] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Any front engine rear drive car going in reverse, lol.

[–] bestusername@aussie.zone 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

What about AWD mid engine?

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 20 points 5 months ago

Worst possible space efficiency and somewhat tricky routing. Lots of parts and complexity. But arguably the best performance and balance if you can deal with the cost and mass. Not uncommon, see Lamborghini, Porsche.

Pretty much obsolete at the top tier, though, since electric motors can trivially distribute the weight and drive even better.

Most supercars are AWD, find one with a mid engine and yeah

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

AWD adds weight, cost, and traction regardless of the engine layout.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

AWD with a mini engine on each wheel.

[–] ShadowCatEXE@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Hoonigan made a video on a twin engine MX3 a few years back. Not quite 4, but it’s a cool car nonetheless.