“Once upon a time, I bought a Brother color laser. It never failed to do its job. The End.”
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
865 points (98.9% liked)
Programmer Humor
37007 readers
419 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I just bought one last week and holy shit you aren't joking. Our Canon was malfunctioning for the last 2 years, so I finally bought a refurbed B&W Brother Laser. I've never had a printer just work like this. I didn't even have to connect to it. My browser just automatically detected it, even on Linux.
My browser just automatically detected it
Wait, what?
Printer support on Linux is honestly better than Windows.
I have one of their all-in-one colour toner machines for my GF's business, it's awesome. Scanning to an SFTP share means she can just feet a stack of paper into it and get a PDF in her Documents/Scans directory.
AND fun fact, there are no lasers in "laser printers" they all use 1D LED arrays to transfer the image data to the drum. Only the early toner based printers used a real laser and they were operating almost like a CRT, scanning a raster onto the drum.
My wife would always call it World War 3 whenever I would go to print something with my inkjet. Finally bought a Brother colour laser a couple years ago. While my distrust of printers is still deep seeded, this printer and I are approaching something of a friendship.
I was just going to comment the same. My Brother laser printer has simply done its job for the last 13 years without issue.
My HL2270DW has been working flawlessly for nearly 10 years now.
Connects to any PC/mac on my home network. Always prints correctly. Toners are dirt cheap
Is OP using a 1998 cannon printer or something?
I just bought a new printer. After reading lots of reviews, it came down to Brother color laser and Canon color laser. Consensus seemed to be Canon was equally reliable with slightly better color quality.
In all fairness, my cheap Brother laser printer hasn’t let me down at all. Unlike the HP inkjets of the past.
I bought mine 12 years ago for college and last week I plugged it in after it sat for several years and printed off some stuff for family with 0 problems.
They last much longer in storage /without printing because toner is a powder, so it can't dry out. The print head of an inkjet printer (part of the cartridge) will dry out if you don't use it for a few weeks.
Still the exact same printer my family has been using for the past 10 years after our old Inkjet kicked the bucket a measly 3 months after it was born. And it has seen some stuff, including being dropped at least twice, plastic film in the paper compartment, coffee-stained (for aged effect) paper, and even a x-acto knife blade that somehow ended up in there.
Big Brother loves you. Really, those are the best printers right now.
my wife was having some problems finding the right W11 drivers for our Brother HL-2030 and dared to utter the thought of replacing it
I shut that down right quick
Windows Update should find the right driver. Failing that, a generic Postscript printer driver should work fine. Windows should have one.
Conversely, I have a recent-ish (<5yrs old) Brother inkjet printer that's waiting to be dumped to recycling because it arbitrarily decided that it didn't ever need to be discoverable or respond to any print requests one day, and so even though there was nothing mechanically wrong with it, even hooking up a Raspberry Pi to run CUPS over USB didn't fix the issue -- because Brother explicitly refuses to publish drivers for the Raspberry Pi, and their inkjet drivers are proprietary.
I've since replaced it with the best-reviewed Epson printer I could find that supports a generic PCL driver, so that if Epson ever loses their minds in the way Brother did, I can fall back on an open-source implementation of good ol' PCL.
That thing's given us no issues so far.
My experience has also been that laser printers work a lot more reliably.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Linux/Cups. Postscript. Laser. Have never had a problem. Printers not working is a "put the logic in the Windoze driver" problem vs telling a good printer "Print this".
Oh, you mean laser printers?
Sadly the consumer laser printer market is in decline and a couple of companies have already exited. I'm not sure how much longer they'll be available (new).
Home printing is a declining market overall, SMB printing has plateaued, and a lot of the die-hard laser printer users are moving away; because bringing big canisters of microplastics into one's home is less appealing than it once was.
True that...
For now, we can hope the surplus from previous generation would last.
😆Can someone make a similar one for bluetooth devices too, pretty please?
And in the shot should be a 3.5mm plug laughing while holding money
i never had problem with bluetooth devices
You must be amazingly lucky. Bluetooth has been nothing but issues for me for 15 years of use, across a plethora of host and client devices, OSes, mobile and desktop, all Bluetooth versions, proprietary implementations (game controllers), cheap devices, expensive devices, ranges, etc. Bluetooth has improved a lot in the past 5 years, but it's still not good enough imo. A PS5 controller can't stay reliably connected to my steam deck that is docked by my TV while I am sitting on my couch, yet an Xbox controller with a wifi-based USB dongle works fine.
Gotta be a Brother
This looks like an office jet pro 8720 which ironically is one of the printers I've had the least trouble with.
I'm running an Epson ecotank now though because the price per page is way better.
I can't even remember the last time I used a printer
You must not work for a company that went paperless then
This hits hard :'(
Get a Brother. My simple black and white laser printer has very strong "ME PRINT FOR YOU. ME PRINT! ME PRINT ALL PAGE FOR YOU" energy. The only beef we have is when he is all "NO PRINT. FEED ME PAPER" and then when fed he goes back to printing no problem.
Can you share the model of the Brother printer you use?
Where programming?
Why do you think it doesn't work?
(Besides the users)
My perception was that this sublemmy was about humoristic takes on programmers' day to day, i.e. programming-related.
This is more IT-related, and the horse is dead and rotting.
fyi, lemmy doesen't have sublemmies, but communities. that's why the url is instance/c/community or yourinstance/c/community@instance
Yes indeed, we call them sublemmy because they're mostly analogous to subreddits, but the official term is communities
Because boss put a windows xp netbook as a print server
Brother®, I know what you mean
It'd be nice if there were open source printers. Somehow we have a few for 3D printers but not 2D printers, and it is annoying as hell.
It's because the printer heads are really hard to make, since the individual nozzles are so tiny.
An decent SLA 3d printer (which will be much more accurate than an FDM printer) can get down to feature sizes of 150 microns. A 300dpi paper printer is hitting about 85 microns, and that's not even a particularly high resolution printer.
Source on SLA printer feature size: https://formlabs.com/blog/3d-printer-resolution-meaning/
We could have Forerunner-level technology and the damn printers still wouldn't work
I do stuff that involves quite a lot of printing, scanning, and copying.
My goofy lil Canon Pixma MG3620 printer has held strong throughout the years.
I will scream if it ever dies, as I have zero desire to peruse the hellscape of current-day printers.
My Canon laser multi-function works fine. Connected with Ethernet it just does its thing.
My wife has had issues printing some PDFs from OSX but she is always too busy for me to look at it.
In an omniverse of infinite dimensions and fundamental particles, there’d be no permutation of any that would permit whatever’s being represented in the comic to exist.
HP LJ 1200
F in chat
view more: next ›