Linux

I don't think Slackware was ever widely used

I still use Slackware and it's a great distro. I very much enjoy its batteries-included approach (a full install comes with pretty much everything pre-installed) and I enjoy its simplicity and ease of configuration and use. There's a learning curve to get there, but once you understand how everything works it's a distro that gets completely out of your way. The bonus is that if you understand Slackware, generally, your knowledge of GNU/Linux broadly will mean you're never lost on any other distro either. Most of my frustrations with other distros actually stem from them patching something/doing something weird with config defaults, whereas Slackware ships stuff as it is from vendors with vendor defaults which I find a lot more palatable and predictable.

Philosophically, I like how Slackware is independent and beholden to no corporate entity. Controversies that have hit other distros in the past as a result of that just aren't a thing with Slackware.

Slackware is a very rewarding distro to use even in 2023. It's not for everyone, but I imagine there's a fair amount of people like me who've probably been using it for ages and have had absolutely no reason to ever consider using anything else. Once you've got everything you want and configured stuff to your liking, it'll just work forever fantastically.

Slackware may not be huge, but it is the base distro for Unraid.

It is still supported and used. It's been my distro of choice for several years.

if you choose the current or the stable stream, last update was yesterday:

• http://www.slackware.com/changelog/stable.php?cpu=x86_64
• http://www.slackware.com/changelog/current.php?cpu=x86_64

If you need help, there are many users that can help you here https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/

Take a look at DistroWatch. I use it when I want to try a new distro, just for fun. Slackware is number 44 in the popularity rank.

I don't know how widely used it is, but it definitely has its fanbase - probably mostly by people who've used it since ages ago.

From what I've read, "supported" is a difficult term for Slackware. It's development is mostly done privately and informal by Volkerding. There's no public issue tracker etc. Releases are done when Volkerding wants to/manages to do them.

It's not a distro for me and I won't recommend it as a daily driver, but Slackware is definitely interesting.

PS: I can't stop me from recommending NixOS/GUIX as another interesting advanced distro. Them being declarative, deterministic and immutable seems to me like the complete opposite to Slackware, which doesn't even do dependencie management.

Slackware is the only distro I've run since the late 90s. I'm not an IT pro or a programmer or even an advanced user.. Slackware just feels right. Give it a shot.

Is the package manager still too dumb to figure out dependencies automatically?

im using it now for my personal laptop. I have an alienware. Slackware was the easiest distro to get my NVIDIA cards working for steam. And these steam games run just as smooth as if they were on console. I also love that its pretty involved and have learned a lot between Slackware and Gentoo. I would definitely give it a try; i think it is very underrated today.

You should give Gentoo a try. I'm a 12 year arch user. Gentoo is really solid and fun though. Or hell if you wanna go that advanced try LFS :)

As much as I Iike and respect Slackware and Patrick Volkerding, I would go with Arch if I were you. According to the change logs, the last commit was June 23rd of this year. Arch is more actively worked on and developed. I learned Linux on Slackware so I will always be partial to it, just like I learned Unix on OpenBSD and will be partial to it as well. But for me, Arch is the way to go for Linux. Arch's wiki is fantastic.

No