this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
84 points (91.2% liked)

politics

19121 readers
2622 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JesusSon@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They should refer to him as convicted felon Donald Trump every time they use his name. Put it all in his face at every turn. Bring up old shit tie it all together and air it all but above all lean into the convicted felon part.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

His supporters do not care.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Swing voters and undecideds do. A significant number of people have said they won’t vote for him again if he got convicted.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s for the independents

[–] themachine@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

If you’re undecided about whether you think Trump or Biden are better leaders in an election at this time, I think news of Trumps conviction isn’t going to sway you. Sorry for sounding so jaded but I just can’t fathom this swaying anyone. I personally don’t understand those people.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

it's not his supporters who need to hear it on repeat.

it's the 30% of people who don't decide until they go into the voting box, who claim to dislike both sides etc.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Twice impeached, convicted felon and rapist, Donald Trump.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

We need to call him a rapist as often as possible. He has done some truly awful shit, but on a basic human level I think this is the worst. He was found by a court of law to have raped a woman. And based on Stormy Daniel’s latest account of their weird consensual sex, Carroll was almost certainly not the only person he raped.

He is an adjudicated rapist.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden's next move: Don't get convicted of any felonies and watch as the media continues to pitch the horse-race and BSAB narratives.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Sure Trump has now been convicted of 34 crimes, but Biden didn't ride a unicorn to my house and give me everything I wanted under a rainbow in the sky so I don't know who to vote for. I mean, I know Joe isn't doing great with Israel now, but something about Trump saying he would do worse really makes me not want to cast my totally centrist and not-at-all bad-faith vote for Biden, you know?"

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

His own words! "I'd finish the problem". Sweet merciful fuck that guy is mask off evil and still people decry harm reduction.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It says something about the state of our democracy that Biden even needs to make another move.

In any sane society, Trump would have been run out of town on a rail.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Admit defeat in the felony race?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

“1. There’s no need to spike the football when the conviction is already dominating the news; 2. polling suggests the race will turn on other issues, so seizing on the conviction could be a trap; and 3. they can always readjust if the conviction somehow turns into more of an anchor for Trump.”

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 4 points 5 months ago

Biden's next move: Nothing.

while 76% said a not-guilty verdict would have no impact

And this is playing pretty true with where I live. Pretty much Trump was found guilty, everyone spent 37.1839 seconds processing that new bit of information, and then went on with their day with the needle on how they will vote in November moving 0.3nm in either direction.

Like, how everyone is going to vote. That's already done. There are very, very, very few people who are left in the undecided category. So, this whole thing wasn't going to change the calculus of anyone running for office.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Twelve jurors in New York have presented their fellow Americans with a simple question: are you willing to elect a convicted criminal to the White House?

On Thursday, Donald Trump was convicted of all 34 counts of falsifying business records in his hush-money trial, a verdict making him the first former president to be found guilty of felony crimes in America’s near 250-year history.

Sentencing was set for 11 July, just days before the Republican national convention in Milwaukee, where Trump would become the first convicted criminal to be anointed a party presidential nominee.

Trump benefited from the fact TV cameras were not allowed into the courtroom, reducing the drama and spectacle offered by the Watergate hearings or the OJ Simpson trial.

A parade of Republicans, including the House speaker, Mike Johnson, came to the court to show their fealty to the president, with most of the fanboys wearing a Trump suit, white shirt and crimson tie.

Trump, who has recently been tempting fate by talking a lot about Al Capone and Hannibal Lecter, inevitably emerged from the court on Thursday to declare, frowning, that “it was a rigged trial, a disgrace”.


The original article contains 816 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

This strategy is called "watching your opponent shoot themself in the foot."

[–] HollandJim@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden’s next move? It’s Miller Time, pal.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Bet he's got some really good ice cream going on tonight lol

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)