this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
239 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3772 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deezbutts@lemm.ee 80 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"Rising fascist dictator considered 'offputting' to some voters"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (3 children)

He's mildly distasteful. Also, "geNocIdEjOe" and #BidenIsSoOld....

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 9 points 5 months ago

It's like people don't get that the choices this year are democracy or political opponents and those who support them start being defenstrated

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Unfortunately fascism isn't nearly offputting enough to what seems like almost a majority if not even the majority

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 68 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He definitely wouldn’t leave. He even said it. And the republicans would jump at the concept of appointing, instead of electing, future presidents.

[–] juergen@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 5 months ago

Yep. Actions speak (even) louder than words, and his track record on leaving office without a tantrum is... not great.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is why they love to get into the WellAktualleeItzNotUhDehmahcraceeeUGuyz! thing all the time....

[–] Savaran@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well it’s a valid concern. So I should fucking hope so.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It's what he tried to do last time, but what are the chances the same guy would do it twice?

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Susan Collins assured me that he's learned his lesson.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I am sure they are very low. I am sure that was a moment of introspection learning.

Just like how he learned from his first bankruptcy.

[–] havocpants@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Yep, yet somehow he's allowed to run again instead of being behind bars.

[–] SmurfNuts@kbin.social 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That and the fact that way more of us Americans hate Trump, are sick to death of his bullshit, and want him gone should help Biden too.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

As long as those people actually vote for Biden and don’t waste their vote on a protest…

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I mean, that's why most people are voting for him in the first place

[–] leadore@kbin.social 13 points 5 months ago

Only one thing is sure--he won't leave willingly, he's as much as said so, as alluded to in the article.

He'd have to be removed in a forceful manner but after another 4 years of him and his minions in control we can't be sure that our institutions, e.g., courts and military, would be able or willing to do that.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I can see it now:

January 2029, President Trump, at 82—over 10 months older than Biden is now—refuses to leave. His supporters surround the White House and storm Capitol Hill.

Trump says it's an emergency, and thus only temporary.

The very rich and military do nothing.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

So sad that it's a "could help".

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


President Joe Biden has consistently claimed that Donald Trump is "determined to destroy American democracy," and it appears that such a fear is slowly spreading among some voters in crucial swing states.

They are worried that the former president would refuse to leave office at the end of a second term if he were reelected to the White House in November, Bloomberg reported, citing political researchers.

He said that the "greater worry" was Trump "declaring a national emergency and refusing to allow the transition," particularly if the Democrats were to win the 2028 presidential election.

Concerns over the possibility that he could violate the 22nd Amendment appear to be very real, leading some toward the idea of voting for Biden despite of significant apprehension about his age, rampant inflation, and the US's continued support for Israel in the Gaza conflict, the Bloomberg report said.

In a video shared by Longwell, Bloomberg said a moderator asked a group of undecided swing-state voters: "Does anybody think he may not abide by the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution and leave office after the 2028 election?

Seiji Carpenter, a vice president at David Binder Research with 10 years of experience running Democrat focus groups, also told Bloomberg that his firm had seen the issue cropping up: "We were talking to Latino men and Asian American-Pacific Islander women in battleground states, and they went straight to the issue of, what if Trump won't give up power?"


The original article contains 709 words, the summary contains 241 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Sounds like some other extreme measure to make him leave when his time is up is 100% warranted if he refuses. I could care less if he leaves unharmed.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This begs a question:

Should those of us who do not wish to see Trump back into office support a peaceful succession of power? I am asking this academically, not seriously. It IS something to consider.

As with most situations I'm in the middle for the moment, leaning towards yes to the succession and also yes to mass marches once it is handed over. There are issues with this as well.

Thoughts?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Trump must not be allowed into office under any circumstances. If it comes down to it, Biden should have him assassinated. Fuck the high road; we've seen where it gets us.

[–] Cincinnatus@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago