this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
639 points (94.2% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6958 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More dataisdepressing than dataisbeautiful

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The important thing here is to know how did they measure young people's political ideologies. I wouldn't expect it was self-perceived as currently, people have a hard time admitting they are conservative compared to admitting they sympathize with a conservative party.

If it was determined by a questionnaire, it would be interesting to see what questions were included. Maybe the questions weren't well planned and that's it. Maybe they equalled feminist takes to ~~progressive~~ liberal ones, which is something that can be discussed. In this case, I would be picky about the origin of the graphics.

[–] lapislazuli@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

This seems to be the original source of this graphic. But it just says "FT analysis of General Social Surveys of Korea, Germany & US [...]"

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If the importance of women's issues like reproductive freedom were overrepresented relative to other issues, this would definitely account for at least part of this difference. But "importance" itself is already a very subjective concept. It's hard to put numbers on these things and create a scoring system that's actually useful.