this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
251 points (95.6% liked)

Games

16944 readers
475 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] missingno@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The biggest thing I miss from yesteryear is all the low budget straight-to-handheld spinoffs. No clear place for those to exist now that dedicated handhelds are dead, and no room for quirky little side projects when publishers are putting all their resources into just a few AAAA megagames.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I don't see how that market was better than what we have now. We still get games like those, but you can play them anywhere. You just have to stop expecting to find them from the publishers you recognize from 20 years ago. Ubisoft and EA don't really make games for us anymore.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What about mobile games? I know the market is weird around them (low cost etc) and maybe I misunderstood your statement.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What about them? They're all garbage.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well the handheld thing, if you make a good game it could be shipped to mobile? Or maybe lacking buttons makes it always crappy?

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yea, eating up loads of screen space for controls and having a tiny screen are big negatives.

Processing power is waaaay less too, but that's been a non-issue for indie quality style graphics for some years, now.

The entire market works off of freemium and piecemeal/ad models, too, which as Tim refuses to admit; people also hate!

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He he I worked in the mobile game industry before smartphones, buttons (flimsy though for many phones) but man has screens gotten not just bigger but better :-)

Power is never an issue, except if you want to showcase some tech instead of making a good game, IMO.

Ya to death with all that dark pattern shit.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The screens getting better pushes directly against graphics processing increases. More pixels takes more power, after all.

Not that it's any excuse... Modern phones are more powerful than the Switch, by a long shot.

I really wish mobile games could be good, but this is modern capitalism: It's not about careers and good products. It's about extracting wealth.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, check out a GBA/DS fat screen vs a DS lite one, it's from that time roughly, not many more pixels but the quality is way different. But sure, a shame the whole mobile game industry is so incredibly crappy.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yea, don't have to render all the pixels for full enjoyment, though I bet things like the UI would love the extra detail.

Either way, the industry has a greedy corpo problem, not a technological limitation problem.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago