Asklemmy

43907 readers

1063 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Do you think that technology will help with social media drug and encourage socializing more? Could this process be reverted? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by xelar@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

While this is true to a degree, there also seems to be indications that some people are more susceptible to addictive behavior than others, so some will only be inclined towards addiction if their circumstances are bad enough to make it more attractive.

I suspect this is similar to smoking causing cancer. Sure, it will likely shorten your life and cause cancer, or you can be like George Burns and smoke regularly for over 70 years.

Ultimately, it's hard to know how susceptible you are to addiction (or smoking-related cancer) until you've taken the chance.