this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
124 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1403 readers
105 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

daniellamyoung_3h

Unpopular opinion: you only hate chat gpt because it makes it harder to stack rank and discriminate against people.

So what everyone can write well now? great it's a tool! Just like moving faster because you drive a car.

The good news is you'll be easily able to hire for that writing job you need. The bad news is you won't be able to discriminate against candidates who are not as good with the written word.

Also, an obsession with the written word is a tenant of white supremacy [salute emoji]

Ian Rennie
‪@theangelremiel.bsky.social‬

Man, this probably hits really hard if you're fuckin stupid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Serious question: what does “stack rank” mean?

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitality_curve

It's become really popular in large tech companies and it's fucking stupid.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you. I’ve never even heard of the term before, and didn’t know if it was slang, a typo, or what. It wouldn’t have occurred to me to search for it.

Yet another word for the good ol' rank-and-yank. Great way to instantly make number go up by suddenly laying off 10-20% of your employees. The trick is making sure you've moved on to another department or another company before the predictable consequences take hold.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago

I read that as "vitality cure" and didn't think twice about it, seemed the appropriate level of evil.

load more comments (1 replies)