this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
64 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
251 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nice, but I wonder if they plan to switch to GPL, or stay with MPL. No mention of that on the website.

[–] psudo@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

They probably won't GPL it, since that'll make the fork even less appealing to companies.

[–] uglo@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(Not a legal advice) AFAIK, they can't. If you want to switch a license you have to get consent of all contributors or (in case of CLA shit) consent of the owner of the code

[–] brie@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

The MPL allows for it as far as I can tell, its just fairly complicated since the MPL would still apply at the file-level for all existing files.