this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
458 points (95.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43952 readers
769 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Biologically male procedures only. EDIT: If the two people who downvoted this question could explain their reasoning, I would be super interested. No judgements. This is a safe space!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Gerudo@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I was actually told by my doctor that unless you have a history of colon or prostate cancers in the family, advisory boards are pushing testing to past 40.

[โ€“] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, as an early 30s AMAB having to go in for annual checkups for insurance, two different doctors told me there really isn't shit to do for someone my age

[โ€“] norimee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Idk. When I worked oncology all our prostate patients were very young men way before 40.

But thats anecdotal. I don't have any numbers. But whats the worst thing that can happen when you get a prostate check? That they don't find anything?

[โ€“] Zorcron@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

I mean the downsides are basically cost, another stick/blood draw, potential for false positive and further anxiety/testing. No weigh-in on whether or not any individual should at any specific time, but even less-invasive screenings are not zero risk.